VS

Skoda Fabia vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (177 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (17,300 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Fabia or Renault Clio?

Skoda Fabia vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Skoda Fabia

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • slightly more trunk space

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Fabia

Renault Clio vs. Skoda Fabia: A Hatchback Showdown

The compact hatchback segment is fiercely competitive, with many automakers striving to deliver the perfect blend of performance, economy, and practicality. Two notable contenders in this category are the Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia. Both are popular choices for urban drivers and those seeking efficiency without sacrificing too much fun. But how do they compare in the latest 2023 and 2024 models?

Clio

Engine and Performance

The Renault Clio offers a diverse engine lineup, including a full hybrid variant alongside traditional petrol and LPG options. The power output ranges from 67 to 143 HP, with varying acceleration benchmarks from 9.3 to 17.1 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint. This flexibility allows Clio drivers to choose a setup that balances fuel efficiency and performance based on their needs.

On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia sticks to petrol engines but varies in power from 80 to 150 HP. Its acceleration spans from a brisk 8 seconds to a more gradual 15.7 seconds for 0-100 km/h, indicating a performance-oriented option available for those who seek a sportier drive.

Fabia

Transmission and Drive

Both the Clio and Fabia are front-wheel-drive vehicles, ensuring excellent agility and handling in urban environments. The Clio enhances your choice with both manual and automatic gearboxes, including a CVT in some variants, while the Fabia offers manual gearboxes and a refined dual-clutch automatic transmission. This variety caters to both traditionalists and those who prefer modern auto conveniences.

Clio

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of dimensions, the Clio measures 4053 mm in length, 1798 mm in width, and 1440 mm in height, making it a compact but accommodating option for city dwellers. It boasts a trunk capacity between 301 and 391 liters, depending on the model variant.

The Fabia, slightly longer at 4108 mm, offers a trunk capacity of 380 liters, providing more space for luggage and shopping bags. Despite being marginally narrower at 1780 mm, its height varies between 1459 and 1479 mm, contributing to a roomier interior feel.

Fabia

Efficiency and Environment

The Clio shines with its hybrid option, achieving an impressive consumption of 4.3 L/100 km and producing as few as 97 g/km of CO2. In contrast, the Fabia's best efficiency is a commendable 5 L/100 km with CO2 emissions around 114 g/km, making it a strong contender for eco-conscious buyers.

Clio

Conclusion

Both the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia offer compelling choices for hatchback enthusiasts. The Clio provides versatility with multiple engine options, including a hybrid model, and a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. Meanwhile, the Fabia appeals to those prioritizing performance with its higher-powered engines and sophisticated dual-clutch transmission. Choosing between them depends largely on the driver's preference for power delivery, tech features, and eco-friendliness.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
If you want a brilliant little hatch that’s cheap to run, slips into tight parking and keeps boot space sensible, the Skoda Fabia is the clever everyday choice; the Skoda Kamiq, by contrast, dresses the same sensible Skoda DNA in a taller, more family-friendly crossover body with extra ride height …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Fabia

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Clio is only slightly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Skoda Fabia costs 17,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 248 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Skoda Fabia with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia offers somewhat more power – delivering 177 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Skoda Fabia is noticeably faster – reaching 228 km/h, while the Renault Clio tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 48 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Fabia delivers visibly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.

Fabia

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Fabia is marginally lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 59 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Fabia offers slightly more boot space – 380 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Fabia offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,190 L, about 14 L more than the Renault Clio.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries very slightly more – 463 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Fabia holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Fabia

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 80 - 177 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
details
Skoda Fabia
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Skoda Fabia

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
The Hyundai i10 is a pocket-sized urban pro — cheeky on fuel, effortless to park and surprisingly roomy for its class, ideal if your daily grind is dodging bollards and squeezing into parallel spaces. The Renault Clio, by contrast, plays the grown-up card with sharper styling, a nicer interior and …
Renault Clio
VW Polo
VS
In the competitive supermini segment, the Renault Clio and VW Polo stand out for their blend of style, performance, and practicality. The Clio boasts a more dynamic design and an engaging driving experience, while the Polo is celebrated for its refined build quality and advanced technology …
Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
In the showdown between the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza, both hatchbacks bring impressive credentials to the table, vying for leadership in the compact car segment. The Renault Clio continues to charm with its chic design and cutting-edge technology, providing a driving experience that balances …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Renault Clio and Toyota Yaris both stand out in the compact car segment, each offering distinct advantages for urban driving. The Clio impresses with its stylish design and exceptional fuel efficiency, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and running costs. Meanwhile, the Yaris shines …
Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
In the compact car showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the VW Golf, both models offer impressive build quality typical of the Volkswagen Group. The Skoda Fabia shines with its exceptional value for money, providing ample space and practicality for urban driving. Meanwhile, the VW Golf maintains …
Dacia Duster
Renault Clio
VS
In the realm of budget-friendly options, the Dacia Duster and Renault Clio stand out with their distinct appeals. The Duster, known for its rugged stance and off-road capabilities, caters to those seeking adventure without breaking the bank. On the other hand, the Clio, with its refined design and …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Skoda Fabia
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 126 g/km
co2
92 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
380 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
4,108 - 4,137 mm
Length
4,116 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
1,458 - 1,459 mm
Height
1,451 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,190 L
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Payload
402 - 437 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
175 - 228 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Fabia have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.