Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Skoda Octavia Combi vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (204 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (25,600 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Octavia Combi or Mazda CX-60?
Skoda Octavia Combi vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Octavia Combi
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Octavia Combi is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,094 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers visibly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 123 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Skoda Octavia Combi takes 6.7 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.
Octavia Combi
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is noticeably lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 524 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers slightly more boot space – 640 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries moderately more – 612 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Octavia Combi
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is a practical, well‑packaged estate that delivers generous and flexible interior space ideal for families or active owners. Its sensible cabin layout, comfortable ride and solid reputation for reliability make it a pragmatic choice for buyers who value utility over flash.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Skoda Octavia Combi
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,829 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
502 - 534 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.