Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Skoda Superb Limousine vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (272 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Superb Limousine or Mazda CX-60?
Skoda Superb Limousine vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Superb Limousine
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Superb Limousine is visibly cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,614 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Limousine uses 1.2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers significantly more range – reaching up to 140 km, about 77 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Limousine is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.6 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers visibly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Superb Limousine
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Limousine is noticeably lighter – 1,559 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 331 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers a bit more boot space – 645 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries only slightly more – 612 kg compared to 580 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Limousine holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £35,100
Skoda Superb Limousine
Skoda Superb Limousine
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Superb Limousine
The Skoda Superb is the quietly imposing saloon that turns everyday practicality into tasteful luxury, with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and a boot that swallows groceries and luggage with military discipline. For buyers who want executive presence without the badge snobbery, it’s a clever, polished choice that rewards sensible thinking with genuine comfort and pragmatic charm.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Skoda Superb Limousine
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,100 - 52,100 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
131 - 140 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
26 - 175 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,559 - 1,896 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
486 - 645 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
441 - 580 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.