VS

smart #1 vs MINI Aceman comparison

Compare performance (428 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (31,700 £ vs 25,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – smart #1 or MINI Aceman?

smart #1 vs MINI Aceman: Key differences

smart #1

  • clearly more power
  • barely more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space

MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • barely lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

#1

An Electric Showdown: MINI Aceman vs Smart #1

In the realm of compact electric SUVs, two dynamic contenders have stepped into the spotlight: the MINI Aceman and the Smart #1. Both vehicles represent the cutting edge of sustainable motoring, yet they cater to slightly different segments of the electric vehicle market. Here's how these two stylish and eco-friendly rides compare.

Aceman

Design and Dimensions

The MINI Aceman is unmistakably a MINI, with its classic design cues reinterpreted for the electric age. Measuring 4,079mm in length, 1,754mm in width, and 1,514mm in height, it's a compact SUV that promises maneuverability alongside its sporty aesthetic. With a trunk capacity of 300L, it offers practicality in a stylish package.

On the other hand, the Smart #1, with its slightly larger body, measures between 4,270mm and 4,300mm in length, with a width of 1,822mm and height of 1,636mm. This gives the Smart #1 a more spacious feel, alongside a trunk capacity of up to 323L, providing a bit more room for luggage and shopping trips.

#1

Power and Performance

Under the hood, the MINI Aceman offers a range of power output options, from 184 HP to an impressive 258 HP. The Aceman's front-wheel drive and automatic transmission with a reduction gearbox ensure a smooth driving experience. It accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as low as 6.4 seconds, with top speeds up to 200 km/h.

By contrast, the Smart #1 cranks out between 272 HP and a whopping 428 HP, with rear-wheel drive as standard and an all-wheel-drive option. It accelerates briskly, achieving 0 to 100 km/h in as quickly as 3.9 seconds, topping out at 180 km/h. This makes the Smart #1 the performance king in this matchup, offering thrill-seekers an exhilarating option.

Aceman

Electric Efficiency and Range

The MINI Aceman's efficient electric drivetrain offers consumption rates as low as 14 kWh/100km, with an electric range spanning from 309 km to 405 km, depending on the model variant. With a battery capacity of up to 49.2 kWh, it promises respectable range for most urban commuters.

The Smart #1, while slightly heavier on consumption rates, offers a larger battery capacity of up to 62 kWh. This translates to an impressive electric range of up to 440 km, with efficiency as low as 16.8 kWh/100km, catering to drivers who need a bit more on-road endurance.

#1

Technology and Innovation

Both vehicles are packed with the latest technology, but each brings its own flavor to the table. The MINI Aceman's infotainment system is complemented by innovative design features, while the Smart #1 leverages its Daimler roots to offer a high-tech user experience with impressive connectivity options and driver-assist features.

Aceman

Practicality and Payload

The Aceman's compact size makes it ideal for city dwellers, with nimble handling and a payload of up to 455 kg. In contrast, the Smart #1, with its slightly larger frame, accommodates a higher payload of 470 kg, making it a practical choice for families or those needing extra cargo space.

#1

Conclusion

Choosing between the MINI Aceman and Smart #1 will largely depend on individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize performance and range, the Smart #1 might sway you with its impressive statistics. However, if classic design and urban maneuverability are high on your list, the MINI Aceman stands out as a strong contender. Both models signal a bright future for electric SUVs, blending innovation with style.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

#1

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MINI Aceman is noticeably cheaper – starting at 25,500 £ , while the smart #1 costs 31,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,248 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14 kWh/100km compared to 16.8 kWh/100km for the smart #1. That’s a difference of about 2.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the smart #1 offers barely more range – reaching up to 440 km, about 35 km more than the MINI Aceman.

Aceman

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the smart #1 offers clearly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #1 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the MINI Aceman is marginally faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the smart #1 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #1 delivers substantially more torque with 584 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 234 Nm more.

#1

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is barely lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 1,780 kg. The difference is around 60 kg.

Looking at boot space, the smart #1 offers marginally more boot space – 323 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 23 L.

For maximum load capacity, the MINI Aceman offers very slightly more capacity – up to 1,005 L, about 19 L more than the smart #1.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries somewhat more – 530 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The smart #1 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,700
#1

smart #1

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.8 - 18.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 310 - 440 km
smart #1
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

smart #1

The Smart #1 feels like a breath of fresh air in the compact EV world, pairing playful styling with usable space and a cabin that punches above its size. It skips the fuss and delivers an easygoing, city-friendly driving experience with clever features that make it a sensible, slightly cheeky choice for everyday motoring.

details

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
smart #1
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

Price
31,700 - 45,000 £
Price
25,500 - 36,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 18.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh/100km
Electric Range
310 - 440 km
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,780 - 1,900 kg
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Trunk capacity
313 - 323 L
Trunk capacity
300 L
Length
4,270 - 4,300 mm
Length
4,079 mm
Width
1,822 mm
Width
1,754 mm
Height
1,636 mm
Height
1,514 mm
Max trunk capacity
976 - 986 L
Max trunk capacity
1,005 L
Payload
425 - 470 kg
Payload
450 - 530 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
smart
Brand
MINI
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.