Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
smart #3 vs Mazda CX-6e comparison
Compare performance (272 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (42,000 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – smart #3 or Mazda CX-6e?
smart #3 vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
#3
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
smart #3 is marginally cheaper – starting at 42,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the smart #3 is a bit more efficient: consuming 16.3 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mazda CX-6e offers barely more range – reaching up to 484 km, about 29 km more than the smart #3.
CX-6e
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers barely more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #3 delivers noticeably more torque with 384 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 94 Nm more.
#3
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is clearly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 395 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-6e offers noticeably more boot space – 468 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 98 L.
When it comes to payload, the smart #3 carries moderately more – 450 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The smart #3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
£41,991
smart #3
smart #3
Mazda CX-6e
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
smart #3
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
Mazda CX-6e
The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.
details
smart #3
Mazda CX-6e
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,000 £
|
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
455 km
|
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
62 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,810 kg
|
Curb weight
2,205 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 L
|
|
Length
4,400 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
Width
1,935 mm
|
|
Height
1,556 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,160 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Payload
385 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
Power HP
258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
384 Nm
|
Torque
290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
Power kW
190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
smart
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.