VS

SsangYong Korando vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (190 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Korando or Mazda CX-80?

SsangYong Korando vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

SsangYong Korando

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Korando

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

SsangYong Korando is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,337 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Korando with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the SsangYong Korando offers clearly more range – reaching up to 339 km, about 279 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 137 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the SsangYong Korando takes 8.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.

Korando

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Korando is substantially lighter – 1,517 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 614 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Korando offers significantly more boot space – 551 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 293 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries markedly more – 650 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 187 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
SsangYong Korando
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

SsangYong Korando

The SsangYong Korando pairs bold, modern styling with a surprisingly roomy and practical cabin, so it looks confident at the lights and handles the daily grind without fuss. It swaps flashy badges for honest value, offering a composed ride, useful equipment and wallet-friendly running that make it an appealing pick for buyers who'd rather spend on weekends than on extravagant finance packages.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
SsangYong Korando
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,000 - 42,000 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
339 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 197 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,840 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
551 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
4,450 - 4,465 mm
Length
-
Width
1,870 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,620 - 1,645 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,248 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
410 - 463 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 190 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
156 - 191 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 360 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
120 - 140 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.