VS

SsangYong Musso vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (202 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (28,700 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Musso or VW T-Cross?

SsangYong Musso vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

SsangYong Musso

  • clearly more power
details

VW T-Cross

3.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Cross is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the SsangYong Musso costs 28,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,311 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Cross uses 5.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the SsangYong Musso with 8.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Musso offers clearly more power – delivering 202 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Musso delivers visibly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

T-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is clearly lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 778 kg.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Musso carries significantly more – 1,010 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 530 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW T-Cross holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
T-Cross

VW T-Cross

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and the VW T-Cross are closely matched compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a touch of SUV style. This comparison focuses on space, fuel economy, driving feel, safety and running costs to help you decide which suits your …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
SsangYong Musso
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SsangYong Musso

The Musso is a no-nonsense pickup that blends rugged capability with surprisingly comfy cabin manners, perfect for buyers who want practicality over prestige. It may not turn heads at the coffee stop, but its sensible layout, useful load space and low running costs make it a very pragmatic choice for workdays and weekends.

details

Reviews SsangYong Musso

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

3.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Meet the VW T‑Cross and VW Taigo: two compact crossovers from Volkswagen chasing the same urban buyers but with very different personalities — the practical, upright T‑Cross versus the swoopy, style-first Taigo. Read on to see which one earns a place in your driveway, whether you prize family …
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris Cross and the VW T‑Cross means deciding whether you want Toyota’s hybrid efficiency and nimble city manners or Volkswagen’s more conventional, spacious small SUV package. The Yaris Cross focuses on low running costs and urban agility, while the T‑Cross delivers a …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and the VW T-Cross are two popular small SUVs that suit different needs: the Qashqai prioritises space, comfort and refinement, while the T-Cross offers compact practicality and strong value for city life. This comparison will help you decide whether you need the roomier, more …
Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Cross
VS
Comparing the Skoda Karoq and the VW T-Cross sets a roomy, family-focused compact SUV against a smaller, city-friendly crossover. The Karoq emphasizes interior space, practicality and comfort on longer trips, while the T-Cross is easier to park, typically cheaper to buy and better suited to urban …
Peugeot 2008
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Peugeot 2008 stands out with its striking design and advanced technology features, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross impresses with its practicality and spacious interior, making it a family-friendly option …
SsangYong Musso
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
SsangYong Musso and Maxus T60 MAX go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Suzuki Vitara
VW T-Cross
VS
Comparing the Suzuki Vitara and the VW T‑Cross helps you weigh a practical, reliable small SUV against a compact, well-built city crossover. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, driving feel, fuel economy and equipment so you can pick the one that fits your everyday needs.
SsangYong Musso
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,700 - 42,700 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
8.4 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
221 - 245 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
75 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,260 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
5,095 - 5,405 mm
Length
-
Width
1,950 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
1,840 - 1,855 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
785 - 1,010 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
202 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
183 - 187 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
400 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
149 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the SsangYong Musso?

The SsangYong Musso is available as All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.