In this showdown between the Suzuki Vitara and VW T-Cross, both compact SUVs offer distinct advantages for urban and adventurous drivers alike. The Vitara impresses with its robust off-road capabilities and generous interior space, while the T-Cross shines with its stylish design and advanced tech features. Ultimately, choosing between these two popular models comes down to whether you prioritize rugged versatility or modern sophistication.
The compact SUV segment is booming, and two contenders that often attract attention are the Suzuki Vitara and the VW T-Cross. Both vehicles offer sharp aesthetics, practicality, and advanced features to suit urban lifestyles and weekend adventures alike. In this comparative analysis, we will delve into the technical specifications and innovations that set these models apart.
The Suzuki Vitara comes equipped with a choice of petrol engines, featuring both Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) and Full Hybrid variants. The MHEV offers a power output of 129 HP with a commendable torque of 235 Nm. This engine, when paired with Suzuki's intelligent All-Wheel Drive, allows for a versatile driving experience. The Vitara can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in a respectable time of 9.5 seconds, making it a solid choice for those who enjoy spirited driving.
On the other hand, the VW T-Cross stands out with several engine options, delivering up to 150 HP from its more powerful variants. The T-Cross has a competitive 0-100 km/h time as well, with the fastest version achieving the mark in just 8.4 seconds. While the T-Cross is restricted to Front-Wheel Drive, its range of engine outputs — combined with a maximum torque rating of 250 Nm — provides sufficient grunt for city and highway cruising.
Fuel efficiency is an essential factor for many SUV buyers, and here the Suzuki Vitara claims the edge with a consumption rating as low as 5.0 L/100 km thanks to its hybrid technology. Its CO2 emissions range from 113 to 129 g/km, placing it in a competitive efficiency class of C and D.
In comparison, the VW T-Cross features slightly higher fuel consumption figures, starting at 5.6 L/100 km and reaching up to 6.0 L/100 km. The T-Cross's CO2 emissions also hover between 127 g/km and 135 g/km. Although the T-Cross is slightly less efficient, it remains a viable option for buyers focused on performance and driving pleasure.
When it comes to interior space, the T-Cross takes the lead. With a trunk capacity of 455 liters, it outshines the Vitara, which offers 375 liters of cargo space. Both vehicles are designed to comfortably seat five passengers, but the T-Cross provides a bit more room for luggage, which is beneficial for family outings or road trips.
Both SUVs come equipped with the latest technology, including advanced infotainment systems and driver-assistance features that enhance safety. The Vitara provides a user-friendly interface, while the T-Cross boasts VW's renowned digital cockpit, allowing drivers to customize their driving experience easily.
In terms of exterior dimensions, the Suzuki Vitara measures 4185 mm in length, 1775 mm in width, and 1595 mm in height. The compact VW T-Cross is slightly smaller, at 4127 mm long, 1784 mm wide, and 1573 mm tall. Despite the T-Cross's diminutive stature, its bold design language and contemporary looks offer an attractive appeal that is hard to overlook.
The Vitara's rugged design hints at its off-road capabilities, while the T-Cross leans towards a sportier and more urban-driven aesthetic. Both SUVs feature five doors for easy access, but the overall aesthetic will likely influence buyers based on personal preferences.
In conclusion, the choice between the Suzuki Vitara and the VW T-Cross largely depends on what you value in a compact SUV. If you prioritize fuel efficiency, hybrid technology, and off-road versatility, the Vitara might suit your needs better. Conversely, if a powerful engine, superior cargo space, and modern technology are more crucial for your lifestyle, the VW T-Cross takes the lead.
Both vehicles showcase the best of what the compact SUV segment has to offer, making either a worthy option for buyers looking to balance practicality with performance. Ultimately, a test drive may be the best way to decide which model truly fits your lifestyle.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 23200 - 30400
£
|
Price
about 20900 - 31300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
113 - 129
g/km
|
co2
127 - 135
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
47
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1255 - 1395
kg
|
Curb weight
1254 - 1326
kg
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375
L
|
Trunk capacity
455
L
|
Length
4185
mm
|
Length
4127
mm
|
Width
1775
mm
|
Width
1784
mm
|
Height
1595
mm
|
Height
1573
mm
|
Payload
375 - 395
kg
|
Payload
474 - 480
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
116 - 129
HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.2
s
|
Max Speed
180 - 190
km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 200
km/h
|
Torque
235
Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
85 - 95
kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Top speed
180 - 190
km/h
|
Top speed
180 - 200
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.