VS

Skoda Karoq vs VW T-Cross - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (190 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Karoq or VW T-Cross?

Karoq

Skoda Karoq vs VW T-Cross: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the ever-evolving world of compact SUVs, two contenders have captured the attention of drivers looking for practicality, performance, and style: the Skoda Karoq and the Volkswagen T-Cross. Both vehicles bring a range of advantages and innovations that cater to various preferences and needs. This article dives deep into a comparison of their technical aspects, performance metrics, and overall innovations to help you make an informed decision.

T-Cross

Body and Dimensions: Designed for Urban Life

The Skoda Karoq exudes a robust and dynamic SUV design, boasting a length of 4,390 mm and a width of 1,841 mm. It stands tall with varying heights from 1,603 mm to 1,624 mm, depending on the variant. In contrast, the VW T-Cross is slightly more compact at 4,127 mm long and 1,784 mm wide, with a height of 1,573 mm. This makes the T-Cross a bit easier to maneuver in tight urban environments while still providing a spacious interior.

Both models feature a five-door configuration and can comfortably seat five passengers, making them prime candidates for family outings or daily commutes.

Karoq

Engine Choices: Power and Efficiency

The Skoda Karoq offers an impressive range of engine options, including petrol and diesel variants with power outputs ranging from 115 to a staggering 190 HP. This versatility allows drivers to choose according to their performance needs or fuel economy. The powertrain innovations feature both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions. Fuel consumption varies from 4.9 L/100 km to 7.6 L/100 km, providing options for efficiency-focused drivers.

On the other hand, the VW T-Cross is powered solely by petrol engines, delivering outputs from a respectable 95 HP to 150 HP. It also offers manual and automatic transmission choices, with fuel consumption stats ranging from 5.6 L/100 km to 6.0 L/100 km, which remain competitive in the market.

T-Cross

Performance Metrics: Acceleration and Handling

When it comes to acceleration, the Skoda Karoq shows impressive figures with a 0-100 km/h time as fast as 7 seconds for its most powerful variant. This performance is reinforced by its all-wheel drive option, providing enhanced traction and responsiveness, especially in challenging driving conditions.

The VW T-Cross, while slightly less powerful, offers a commendable performance with a 0-100 km/h time as low as 8.4 seconds. Although it does not provide an all-wheel-drive variant, its front-wheel-drive system ensures efficiency and lighter handling, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers.

Karoq

Interior and Space: Comfort Meets Practicality

Both vehicles shine when it comes to interior space and comfort. The Skoda Karoq boasts a trunk capacity of 521 liters, allowing for ample storage for luggage or groceries. The interior is adorned with quality materials and a user-friendly infotainment system that enhances the driving experience.

The VW T-Cross, although smaller in trunk capacity at 455 liters, offers a clever use of space and versatility, including its adjustable luggage floor. The T-Cross also matches the Karoq in terms of modern technology and comfort features, ensuring a pleasant ride for both the driver and passengers.

T-Cross

Eco-Friendliness: Emissions and Efficiency Classes

In terms of environmental impact, the Skoda Karoq has varying CO2 emissions, ranging from 129 g/km to 174 g/km, depending on the engine variant. With a CO2 efficiency class that includes D and E ratings, it reflects a moderate environmental performance in its class.

The VW T-Cross, with a more focused petrol lineup, has CO2 emissions between 127 g/km and 135 g/km, all categorized under efficiency class D. This slight edge in emissions may appeal to eco-conscious buyers looking for a responsible urban vehicle.

Karoq

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

In summary, the choice between the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Cross ultimately hinges on individual preferences and requirements. The Karoq offers a more powerful lineup, diverse engine options, and larger cargo capacity, catering to those who prioritize performance and utility. Meanwhile, the T-Cross appeals to urban drivers seeking efficient operation, compactness, and a smart approach to space.

Both models encapsulate the essence of modern SUVs, combining comfort, advanced technology, and practical design. Whichever you choose, both the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Cross promise to deliver a gratifying driving experience suited for today’s lifestyles.

Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Cross has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Skoda Karoq costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7688 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Karoq manages with 4.90 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Karoq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 190 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Karoq pulls distinct stronger with 360 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm difference.

T-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is hardly perceptible lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1380 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers somewhat more room – 521 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Karoq a bit takes the win – 549 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Karoq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Skoda Karoq
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £29,100
Karoq

Skoda Karoq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 7.6 L
details

Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494

VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Kia Sportage
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Kia Sportage flaunts a bolder design, plush cabin and tech-heavy kit that feels like buying the future — perfect if you want comfort and a bit of showmanship on your commute. The Skoda Karoq plays the sensible sibling: conservative looks, clever packaging, enjoyable handling and better value, …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
29100 - 41700 £
Price
21400 - 32000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
128 - 173 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
521 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
Length
-
Width
1841 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
456 - 549 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson delivers futuristic styling, a roomy, tech-rich cabin and punchy powertrains that make it the practical yet showy family SUV in this duel. The Skoda Karoq, meanwhile, trades flash for cleverness — smaller and sharper to drive with brilliant storage solutions and better everyday …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the VW Polo and the VW T-Cross cater to different driving needs while maintaining Volkswagen's signature quality. The Polo, a beloved supermini, offers a sleek and nimble ride ideal for urban environments, boasting efficiency and precision handling. On the other hand, …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Ford Kuga shines with its dynamic driving experience and advanced technological features, making it a favorite among enthusiasts. In contrast, the Skoda Karoq impresses with its practicality and spacious interior, offering exceptional comfort for …
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
The Toyota Yaris Cross sails ahead with brilliant hybrid economy, city-sized agility and Toyota’s trademark reliability, while the VW T‑Cross scores for sensible packaging, a bigger boot and a more grown-up driving feel. If you live in town and worship low fuel bills pick the Yaris Cross; if you …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities while sharing a similar platform. The Arona embodies a sporty spirit with its dynamic styling and vibrant color options, appealing to a younger audience, while the T-Cross emphasizes practicality …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Renault Captur and VW T-Cross both stand out with unique offerings. The Captur impresses with its stylish design and comfortable ride, backed by a range of efficient engines that suit urban lifestyles. Meanwhile, the T-Cross delivers solid German …
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs and wagons, the Skoda Karoq and Skoda Octavia Combi each offer unique advantages suited to different driving preferences. The Skoda Karoq boasts a higher driving position and versatile off-road capabilities, perfect for adventurers seeking practicality …
What drive types are available for the Skoda Karoq?

The Skoda Karoq is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.