@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Skoda Karoq vs VW T-Cross – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Skoda Karoq meets VW T-Cross.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq vs VW T-Cross: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the ever-evolving world of compact SUVs, two contenders have captured the attention of drivers looking for practicality, performance, and style: the Skoda Karoq and the Volkswagen T-Cross. Both vehicles bring a range of advantages and innovations that cater to various preferences and needs. This article dives deep into a comparison of their technical aspects, performance metrics, and overall innovations to help you make an informed decision.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Body and Dimensions: Designed for Urban Life

The Skoda Karoq exudes a robust and dynamic SUV design, boasting a length of 4,390 mm and a width of 1,841 mm. It stands tall with varying heights from 1,603 mm to 1,624 mm, depending on the variant. In contrast, the VW T-Cross is slightly more compact at 4,127 mm long and 1,784 mm wide, with a height of 1,573 mm. This makes the T-Cross a bit easier to maneuver in tight urban environments while still providing a spacious interior.

Both models feature a five-door configuration and can comfortably seat five passengers, making them prime candidates for family outings or daily commutes.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine Choices: Power and Efficiency

The Skoda Karoq offers an impressive range of engine options, including petrol and diesel variants with power outputs ranging from 115 to a staggering 190 HP. This versatility allows drivers to choose according to their performance needs or fuel economy. The powertrain innovations feature both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions. Fuel consumption varies from 4.9 L/100 km to 7.6 L/100 km, providing options for efficiency-focused drivers.

On the other hand, the VW T-Cross is powered solely by petrol engines, delivering outputs from a respectable 95 HP to 150 HP. It also offers manual and automatic transmission choices, with fuel consumption stats ranging from 5.6 L/100 km to 6.0 L/100 km, which remain competitive in the market.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Performance Metrics: Acceleration and Handling

When it comes to acceleration, the Skoda Karoq shows impressive figures with a 0-100 km/h time as fast as 7 seconds for its most powerful variant. This performance is reinforced by its all-wheel drive option, providing enhanced traction and responsiveness, especially in challenging driving conditions.

The VW T-Cross, while slightly less powerful, offers a commendable performance with a 0-100 km/h time as low as 8.4 seconds. Although it does not provide an all-wheel-drive variant, its front-wheel-drive system ensures efficiency and lighter handling, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Interior and Space: Comfort Meets Practicality

Both vehicles shine when it comes to interior space and comfort. The Skoda Karoq boasts a trunk capacity of 521 liters, allowing for ample storage for luggage or groceries. The interior is adorned with quality materials and a user-friendly infotainment system that enhances the driving experience.

The VW T-Cross, although smaller in trunk capacity at 455 liters, offers a clever use of space and versatility, including its adjustable luggage floor. The T-Cross also matches the Karoq in terms of modern technology and comfort features, ensuring a pleasant ride for both the driver and passengers.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Eco-Friendliness: Emissions and Efficiency Classes

In terms of environmental impact, the Skoda Karoq has varying CO2 emissions, ranging from 129 g/km to 174 g/km, depending on the engine variant. With a CO2 efficiency class that includes D and E ratings, it reflects a moderate environmental performance in its class.

The VW T-Cross, with a more focused petrol lineup, has CO2 emissions between 127 g/km and 135 g/km, all categorized under efficiency class D. This slight edge in emissions may appeal to eco-conscious buyers looking for a responsible urban vehicle.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

In summary, the choice between the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Cross ultimately hinges on individual preferences and requirements. The Karoq offers a more powerful lineup, diverse engine options, and larger cargo capacity, catering to those who prioritize performance and utility. Meanwhile, the T-Cross appeals to urban drivers seeking efficient operation, compactness, and a smart approach to space.

Both models encapsulate the essence of modern SUVs, combining comfort, advanced technology, and practical design. Whichever you choose, both the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Cross promise to deliver a gratifying driving experience suited for today’s lifestyles.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Cross has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £, while the Skoda Karoq costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 8005 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Karoq manages with 4.90 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 190 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs minimal better – reaching 221 km/h, while the VW T-Cross tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 21 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Karoq pulls distinct stronger with 360 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm difference.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is hardly perceptible lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1380 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers somewhat more room – 521 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq performs distinct better – up to 1630 L, which is about 349 L more than the VW T-Cross.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Karoq a bit takes the win – 549 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Karoq shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £29,100
Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 7.6 L

Skoda Karoq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.

details

VW T-Cross

4 (1)
rate

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Cross
Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
29100 - 41700 £
Price
21100 - 31500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
128 - 173 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
521 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
Length
4127 mm
Width
1841 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
Max trunk capacity
1281 L
Payload
456 - 549 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Skoda Karoq?

The Skoda Karoq is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.