In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Peugeot 2008 stands out with its striking design and advanced technology features, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross impresses with its practicality and spacious interior, making it a family-friendly option that doesn't compromise on comfort. When it comes to driving dynamics, the Peugeot delivers a sportier experience, while the T-Cross prioritizes a smooth and stable ride, catering to different preferences among consumers.
The compact SUV segment has become increasingly popular, and two strong contenders vying for attention are the Peugeot 2008 and the VW T-Cross. Both models stand out in their respective ways, boasting advanced features, innovative designs, and competitive performance. This article delves deep into their technical aspects, innovations, and overall comparisons to help you decide which model suits your needs best.
Starting with design, the Peugeot 2008 offers a bold and dynamic exterior with aggressive lines and a predatory stance. Its dimensions measure 4304 mm in length, 1770 mm in width, and 1523 mm in height. The attractive front grille and signature LED lighting enhance its modern appeal.
On the other hand, the VW T-Cross leans towards a more conservative yet stylish demeanor, with dimensions of 4127 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and 1573 mm in height. Its larger width and height provide a more prominent road presence, while its clean lines and characteristic VW design elements add to its charm.
When it comes to engine options, both vehicles deliver an impressive range. The Peugeot 2008 is available with a petrol mild-hybrid engine, traditional petrol engines, and even electric variants, showcasing versatility. Power outputs range from 101 HP up to 156 HP, with fuel consumption figures between 5 to 5.7 L/100 km, depending on the configuration.
The VW T-Cross, while offering only petrol engine options, provides a robust lineup with power ratings from 95 HP to 150 HP. Fuel consumption stays competitive at around 5.6 to 6 L/100 km. Both vehicles offer front-wheel drive, making them well-suited for urban driving conditions.
In terms of acceleration, the Peugeot 2008 impressively reaches 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, showcasing its sporty edge. Meanwhile, the T-Cross performs well, with its quickest version achieving the same acceleration in 8.4 seconds. However, in terms of top speed, the 2008 comes out on top with 206 km/h, compared to the T-Cross’s maximum of 200 km/h.
Inside the cabin, both models accommodate five passengers comfortably, with the Peugeot 2008 offering a trunk capacity of 434 liters, slightly less than the VW T-Cross’s 455 liters, providing a practical edge when it comes to storage. Peugeot's flair for interior design shines through with its high-tech i-Cockpit, featuring a compact steering wheel and a prominent digital display.
Conversely, the T-Cross presents a more traditional and spacious layout with VW's user-friendly infotainment system. Both vehicles are equipped with modern amenities, but the Peugeot 2008 emphasizes a more stylish and futuristic cabin feel.
As sustainability becomes a vital factor for consumers, the Peugeot 2008 takes the lead, offering both petrol and electric powertrains. The electric model boasts a range of up to 406 km and a battery capacity of 51 kWh, catering to eco-conscious drivers looking to reduce their carbon footprint.
Meanwhile, the T-Cross doesn't offer an electric variant, but it does come with efficient petrol engines designed to minimize emissions, earning it a CO2 efficiency class of D. While it may lack the electric option, VW has implemented numerous fuel-saving technologies throughout its lineup.
Ultimately, the decision between the Peugeot 2008 and the VW T-Cross largely depends on individual preferences. If you prioritize innovative design, electrification options, and sporty performance, the Peugeot 2008 could be your ideal choice. Conversely, if you prefer a more practical and spacious vehicle with robust engine options, the VW T-Cross is worth considering.
Both models have their strengths, making them compelling choices in the growing compact SUV market. Assess your needs, test drive both options, and make an informed decision that suits your lifestyle.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 23200 - 38200
£
|
Price
about 20900 - 31300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.7
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 15.9
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
343 - 406
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
113, 129, 0
g/km
|
co2
127 - 135
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
44
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1263 - 1623
kg
|
Curb weight
1254 - 1326
kg
|
Trunk capacity
434
L
|
Trunk capacity
455
L
|
Length
4304
mm
|
Length
4127
mm
|
Width
1770
mm
|
Width
1784
mm
|
Height
1523
mm
|
Height
1573
mm
|
Payload
407 - 447
kg
|
Payload
474 - 480
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
101 - 156
HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.2
s
|
Max Speed
150 - 206
km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 200
km/h
|
Torque
205 - 270
Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
74 - 115
kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
1199
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Top speed
150 - 206
km/h
|
Top speed
180 - 200
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.