VS

SsangYong Rexton vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (202 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Rexton or VW T-Cross?

SsangYong Rexton vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more trunk space
details

VW T-Cross

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rexton

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW T-Cross is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the SsangYong Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,740 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Cross uses 5.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Rexton offers clearly more power – delivering 202 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Cross is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.4 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Rexton delivers considerably more torque with 441 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 191 Nm more.

Rexton

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is significantly lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 878 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers considerably more boot space – 784 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 329 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries visibly more – 770 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 290 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW T-Cross holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
T-Cross

VW T-Cross

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Cross
VS
The Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross are direct rivals in the small crossover segment, offering compact, practical packaging and easy urban manners. This quick comparison cuts through the similarities to show which model is stronger on space, equipment, driving feel and value so you can pick the right …
SsangYong Rexton
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Heckansicht_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Seitenansicht_300dpi
1_SsangYong_neuer_Rexton_2020_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Innenansicht_1_300dpi

Reviews SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Frank Williams CPA/ ACCA/ CPD
22 Jan 2026, 01:20:01

Ssang Yong Rexton is better than the Land Cruiser

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Jarek
12 Sept 2026, 16:16:59

Very capable and well-built car. Good on the road, nicely quiet up to 100 km/h. Praise for the 1.5 TSI engine — very dynamic and very economical. Over a distance of 36,000 km the average fuel consumption is 6.2 liters per 100 km. Half on high-speed roads, half in the city. Driven with a heavy foot.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Arturo
27 May 2026, 04:19:26

In terms of interior space and driving, the T‑Cross is far superior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volkswagen T-Cross and T-Roc are compact SUVs that share family DNA but target different buyers. The T-Cross prioritizes urban practicality, low running costs and easy parking, while the T-Roc offers more interior space, stronger engine options and a sportier driving character.
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and the VW T-Cross are two popular small SUVs that suit different needs: the Qashqai prioritises space, comfort and refinement, while the T-Cross offers compact practicality and strong value for city life. This comparison will help you decide whether you need the roomier, more …
Citroen C3 Aircross
VW T-Cross
VS
Putting the Citroën C3 Aircross up against the VW T‑Cross pits a characterful, comfort-focused small SUV against a more conservative, all-round practical choice. Both target urban buyers who need space and versatility, but they differ in ride, interior quality and features—pick the C3 Aircross for …
Hyundai Bayon
VW T-Cross
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and VW T‑Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want small‑car agility with SUV practicality, easy city driving and low running costs. The Bayon punches above its weight on value, tech and bold styling, while the T‑Cross leans towards a more refined interior, …
Toyota Corolla Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
The Toyota Corolla Cross and VW T-Cross compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Cross
VS
Comparing the SEAT Ateca and the VW T-Cross is essentially a choice between a more spacious, accomplished compact SUV and a smaller, city-focused crossover where maneuverability and value matter most. The Ateca delivers stronger performance, a more refined ride and greater practicality for …
Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
The Audi Q2 and VW T‑Cross are compact crossovers that blend city-friendly size with SUV styling, but they take very different approaches to luxury, practicality and driving feel. This head-to-head compares their engines, interiors, technology and ownership costs so you can decide which suits your …
Suzuki Vitara
VW T-Cross
VS
Comparing the Suzuki Vitara and the VW T‑Cross helps you weigh a practical, reliable small SUV against a compact, well-built city crossover. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, driving feel, fuel economy and equipment so you can pick the one that fits your everyday needs.
SsangYong Rexton
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
214 - 216 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4,850 mm
Length
-
Width
1,960 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
1,825 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
655 - 770 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
202 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
184 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
441 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
148 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
VW
Is the SsangYong Rexton offered with different drivetrains?

The SsangYong Rexton is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.