VS

SsangYong Torres vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (207 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (33,800 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Torres or VW T-Cross?

SsangYong Torres vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

SsangYong Torres

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • visibly more trunk space
details

VW T-Cross

3.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Torres

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Cross is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the SsangYong Torres costs 33,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,454 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Cross uses 5.4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Torres with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Torres offers markedly more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Torres delivers clearly more torque with 339 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 89 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is slightly lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 231 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Torres offers visibly more boot space – 703 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 248 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Torres carries somewhat more – 552 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The SsangYong Torres is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,800
Torres

SsangYong Torres

  • Engine Type Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 207 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 462 km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Cross
VS
The Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross are direct rivals in the small crossover segment, offering compact, practical packaging and easy urban manners. This quick comparison cuts through the similarities to show which model is stronger on space, equipment, driving feel and value so you can pick the right …
SsangYong Torres
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SsangYong Torres

SsangYong Torres cuts a rugged, purposeful silhouette that feels more expensive than its price tag, offering generously practical packaging and a no-nonsense feature set. It drives with surprisingly assured manners and genuine off-road appetite, making it a clever choice for buyers who want real SUV capability without badge snobbery.

details
serpimg_HNB7qw

Reviews SsangYong Torres

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Nelson GAlindo Arias
12 May 2026, 21:17:14

It's a comfortable car with good performance and economical.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

3.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
Arturo
27 May 2026, 04:19:26

In terms of interior space and driving, the T‑Cross is far superior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3 Aircross
VW T-Cross
VS
Putting the Citroën C3 Aircross up against the VW T‑Cross pits a characterful, comfort-focused small SUV against a more conservative, all-round practical choice. Both target urban buyers who need space and versatility, but they differ in ride, interior quality and features—pick the C3 Aircross for …
VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volkswagen T-Cross and T-Roc are compact SUVs that share family DNA but target different buyers. The T-Cross prioritizes urban practicality, low running costs and easy parking, while the T-Roc offers more interior space, stronger engine options and a sportier driving character.
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and the VW T-Cross are closely matched compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a touch of SUV style. This comparison focuses on space, fuel economy, driving feel, safety and running costs to help you decide which suits your …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Cross
VS
Comparing the SEAT Ateca and the VW T-Cross is essentially a choice between a more spacious, accomplished compact SUV and a smaller, city-focused crossover where maneuverability and value matter most. The Ateca delivers stronger performance, a more refined ride and greater practicality for …
Hyundai Bayon
VW T-Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Hyundai Bayon or the VW T-Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
The Audi Q2 and VW T‑Cross are compact crossovers that blend city-friendly size with SUV styling, but they take very different approaches to luxury, practicality and driving feel. This head-to-head compares their engines, interiors, technology and ownership costs so you can decide which suits your …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and the VW T-Cross are two popular small SUVs that suit different needs: the Qashqai prioritises space, comfort and refinement, while the T-Cross offers compact practicality and strong value for city life. This comparison will help you decide whether you need the roomier, more …
VW Golf
VW T-Cross
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Cross comes down to whether you want a traditional hatchback with sharper driving dynamics or a compact crossover that prioritizes space, practicality and a higher seating position. The Golf rewards with more engaging handling and a refined interior, while …
SsangYong Torres
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,800 - 44,600 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
462 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 207 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,618 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
703 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4,700 mm
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
1,710 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,662 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
552 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 207 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
191 - 194 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
280 - 339 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
120 - 152 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the SsangYong Torres have?

The SsangYong Torres is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.