Compare performance (306 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (49,900 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Across or Suzuki S-Cross?
When it comes to versatility and innovation in the compact SUV segment, Suzuki has made impressive strides with two standout models: the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across. Both vehicles cater to a modern audience seeking practicality and advanced technology, but they differ significantly in terms of performance and features. Let’s dive deeper into a comparison of these two formidable contenders.
The Suzuki S-Cross offers a choice between a Full Hybrid engine and a petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) variant, with power outputs of 116 and 129 HP, respectively. Both engines exhibit an admirable balance of efficiency and performance, making the S-Cross a reliable choice for everyday driving.
In contrast, the Suzuki Across takes performance a step further with its robust Plug-in Hybrid system that generates an impressive 306 HP. This model not only supports an exhilarating drive—achieving 0 to 100 km/h in just 6 seconds—but it also provides an electric range of up to 75 km, making it highly suitable for urban commuting while minimizing environmental impact.
Frugal fuel consumption is increasingly important to car buyers, and both models showcase Suzuki’s commitment to sustainability. The S-Cross boasts various fuel consumption figures ranging from 5.1 to 5.8 L/100km, allowing it to maintain a competitive presence in the compact SUV category.
On the other hand, the Across stands out for its extraordinary efficiency, reported at approximately 1 L/100km. Coupled with a CO2 emission figure of just 22 g/km, the Across firmly positions itself as a champion of eco-friendliness in the SUV market.
When it comes to size, the S-Cross measures 4300 mm in length, 1785 mm in width, and 1580 mm in height, making it compact yet spacious enough for five occupants. Its trunk capacity of 430 liters adds to its practicality as a family vehicle.
The Across, however, is the more substantial option, measuring 4635 mm in length and 1855 mm in width. Its trunk capacity also surpasses that of the S-Cross, offering 490 liters of storage space. This additional room makes the Across an appealing option for those requiring extra cargo capacity.
The S-Cross provides a comfortable and engaging driving experience, available in both Front-Wheel Drive (FWD) and All-Wheel Drive (AWD) configurations. It also offers options in transmission, including an automated manual gearbox or a traditional manual gearbox, catering to a wide range of driving preferences.
The Across shines with its advanced All-Wheel Drive system and a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), ensuring smooth acceleration and handling on various terrains. With its cutting-edge technology features, it enhances the driving experience with advanced safety systems and infotainment that keep drivers connected.
While both the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across deliver exceptional value, the choice ultimately depends on individual needs. The S-Cross is likely to appeal more to budget-conscious buyers looking for a reliable SUV with a solid mix of features. In comparison, the Across targets those who desire greater power and efficiency and are willing to invest more for a premium experience.
In conclusion, both the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across present compelling options in the compact SUV market, each with its unique set of advantages. The S-Cross offers a practical and economical driving experience, while the Across redefines what an SUV can offer with its hybrid technology and superior performance. Depending on your preferences for power, efficiency, and space, either model could potentially meet your next automotive needs.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Suzuki S-Cross is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Suzuki Across costs 49,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,115 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Across uses 1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 4.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Across offers substantially more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 196 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Suzuki S-Cross is marginally faster – reaching 185 km/h, while the Suzuki Across tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is considerably lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 2,075 kg. The difference is around 795 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Across offers slightly more boot space – 490 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 60 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Suzuki Across offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,604 L, about 374 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.
When it comes to payload, the Suzuki Across carries marginally more – 435 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
The Suzuki Across stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Suzuki Across is Suzuki's take on a roomy, efficient plug-in SUV handed down from its Toyota cousin, marrying sensible practicality with a polished, grown-up driving character. It won't thrill those chasing sporty drama, but for buyers who value measured refinement, low running costs and lots of usable space, it's an unexpectedly accomplished and subtly premium package.
details
The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,900 £
|
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
22 g/km
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,075 kg
|
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
490 L
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
|
Length
4,635 mm
|
Length
4,305 mm
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,785 mm
|
|
Height
1,690 mm
|
Height
1,580 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,604 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,230 L
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,487 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España