VS

Suzuki Swace vs Volvo EC40 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (140 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (31900 £ vs 46600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swace or Volvo EC40?

Suzuki Swace

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Swace

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki Swace has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 31900 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14743 £.

EC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 has a decisively edge – offering 442 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 302 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.40 s. That’s about 4.80 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.

Swace

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki Swace is clearly perceptible lighter – 1475 kg compared to 2065 kg. The difference is around 590 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers evident more room – 596 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 192 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Suzuki Swace performs noticeable better – up to 1606 L, which is about 410 L more than the Volvo EC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo EC40 to a small extent takes the win – 435 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Suzuki Swace
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £46,600
EC40

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.2 - 17.3 kWh
  • Electric Range : 488 - 584 km
details

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric

Reviews Suzuki Swace

Reviews Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
In the competitive compact car segment, the Suzuki Swace and Toyota Corolla present enticing options for buyers seeking reliability and efficiency. While both share a similar platform, the Swace offers distinctive styling and a slightly sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize …
Ford Focus
Suzuki Swace
VS
In a showdown between the Ford Focus and the Suzuki Swace, the Focus stands out with its dynamic handling and robust engine options that cater to driving enthusiasts seeking a spirited ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swace offers a practical hybrid drivetrain with outstanding fuel efficiency, making it …
Suzuki Swace
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
31900 £
Price
46600 - 59000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.50 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
co2
102 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1475 kg
Curb weight
2065 - 2185 kg
Trunk capacity
596 L
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
4655 mm
Length
4440 mm
Width
1790 mm
Width
1873 mm
Height
1460 mm
Height
1591 mm
Max trunk capacity
1606 L
Max trunk capacity
1196 L
Payload
360 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.40 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
1798 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
In the latest head-to-head comparison of the Volvo EC40 and EX40, enthusiasts will appreciate the subtle design differences and performance variations that set these two electric models apart. While the EC40 leans toward a more rugged, SUV-like stance, the EX40 offers a sleek, urban vibe with its …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EC40
VS
In the burgeoning realm of electric SUVs, both the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo XC40 Recharge stand as titans of innovation and design. The Q4 e-tron offers a sophisticated driving experience with its sleek aesthetics and intuitive technology package, whereas the XC40 Recharge matches its elegance …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports, both cars deliver remarkable hybrid performance with a focus on fuel efficiency and practicality. The Suzuki Swace, essentially a rebadged version of the Corolla, offers nearly identical interiors and …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
Unsure whether the Volvo EX30 or the Volvo EC40 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EC40 and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Capri
Volvo EC40
VS
Ford Capri and Volvo EC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EC40
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and Volvo EC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Volvo EC40
Tesla Model Y
VS
The Volvo EC40 and Tesla Model Y compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drivetrain options does the Suzuki Swace have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.