VS

Suzuki Swace vs Volvo EC40 comparison

Compare performance (140 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (31,900 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swace or Volvo EC40?

Suzuki Swace vs Volvo EC40: Key differences

Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • visibly lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Volvo EC40

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Swace

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Swace is considerably cheaper – starting at 31,900 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,657 £.

EC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers substantially more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 302 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.

Swace

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is visibly lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 590 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers markedly more boot space – 596 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 192 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EC40 carries somewhat more – 435 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,500
EC40

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 486 - 585 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
Deciding between the Volvo C40 (commonly called the C40 Recharge) and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you prefer a coupé‑style compact electric with sharper styling or a more conventional compact electric SUV focused on practicality. This quick comparison will run through range, interior …
BMW iX2
Volvo EC40
VS
The BMW iX2 and Volvo EC40 are rival compact electric crossovers aimed at buyers who want sporty driving and premium design in a small EV package. This comparison looks at range, performance, interior quality, tech, practicality and ownership to help you decide which best fits your priorities.
Suzuki Swace
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric

Reviews Volvo EC40

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are closely related compact estate cars that combine hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly space. This comparison focuses on how the Swace and the Corolla Touring Sports differ in styling, equipment, driving feel and running costs …
Volvo EC40
Volvo EX60
VS
Unsure whether the Volvo EC40 or the Volvo EX60 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Volvo EC40
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the latest comparison of the Volvo EC40 and Skoda Elroq, both vehicles showcase impressive electric capabilities and distinctive styling that cater to modern drivers. The EC40 stands out with its minimalist interior and advanced safety features, while the Elroq offers a balance of practicality …
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo C40 and Volvo XC40 are closely related compact Volvos that deliver strong safety, premium interiors and modern tech, but they take different routes: the C40 is a coupe‑styled, electric‑first model focused on design and emission‑free driving, while the XC40 is a more conventional SUV …
Citroen C4
Volvo EC40
VS
The Citroen C4 and Volvo EC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
DS Automobiles DS 4
Suzuki Swace
VS
Unsure whether the DS Automobiles DS 4 or the Suzuki Swace is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EC40
VS
Ford Explorer EV and Volvo EC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Suzuki Swace
Volvo EC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
31,900 £
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Trunk capacity
596 L
Trunk capacity
404 L
Length
4,655 mm
Length
-
Width
1,790 mm
Width
1,873 mm
Height
1,460 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
360 kg
Payload
395 - 435 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Volvo
Is the Suzuki Swace offered with different drivetrains?

The Suzuki Swace is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.