Compare performance (340 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Volvo EC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Explorer EV is noticeably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,334 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers marginally more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 17 km more than the Volvo EC40.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers noticeably more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Ford Explorer EV takes 5.3 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers marginally more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is only slightly lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 69 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Explorer EV offers somewhat more boot space – 472 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries noticeably more – 585 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 150 kg.
The Ford Explorer EV has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
detailsThe Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
|
Price
46,500 - 59,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|