VS

Suzuki Swift vs Skoda Fabia comparison

Compare performance (82 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swift or Skoda Fabia?

Suzuki Swift vs Skoda Fabia: Key differences

Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
details

Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Swift

Head-to-Head: Skoda Fabia vs. Suzuki Swift

The automotive market is ever-evolving, and with it comes fierce competition among compact hatchbacks. In this article, we dive into a detailed comparison between two popular choices: the Skoda Fabia and the Suzuki Swift. Both vehicles offer strong attributes, but which one emerges as the best compact hatchback for consumers in 2024? Let's take a closer look at their technical specifications and innovations.

Fabia

Engine and Performance

The Skoda Fabia boasts a variety of petrol engine options, ranging from 80 HP to a powerful 150 HP, providing drivers ample choices based on their performance preferences. With 3 and 4-cylinder options, consumers can also customize their driving experience depending on personal needs. Notably, power delivery is efficient, with top speeds reaching up to 225 km/h and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8 seconds, particularly impressive for a car in this segment.

On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift features a less diverse engine lineup, offering a single petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) engine rated at 82 HP. The Swift performs adequately with a top speed of 170 km/h and a modest acceleration time, reflecting its focus on efficiency rather than raw power.

Swift

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Fabia stands at an attractive range of 5 to 5.5 L/100 km, making it a relatively efficient option amidst its peers. Additionally, its CO2 emissions fall within the D and C efficiency classes, contributing to lower environmental impact values compared to older vehicles.

The Swift excels even further in this category, showcasing impressive fuel consumption figures between 4.4 and 4.9 L/100 km. Its CO2 emissions are commendably low, ranging from 98 to 110 g/km, indicating a more environmentally friendly choice for eco-conscious consumers.

Fabia

Interior Space and Comfort

Space and comfort are crucial aspects of any hatchback, and the Fabia shines in this respect. With a trunk capacity of 380 liters, it offers best-in-class cargo space, allowing drivers to carry more baggage and groceries. The cabin features ample legroom for five passengers, enhancing the overall driving experience.

The Suzuki Swift, however, provides a more compact experience with a trunk capacity of just 265 liters. While it comfortably seats five, the overall cabin space may feel slightly constrained compared to the Fabia, making it less suitable for long family trips.

Swift

Driving Dynamics

Driving dynamics significantly enhance the enjoyment of any car. The Skoda Fabia offers a front-wheel-drive layout with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, allowing drivers to select their preference. This flexibility transforms the driving experience, catering to enthusiasts and daily commuters alike.

The Suzuki Swift comes equipped with front-wheel-drive options and allows for an all-wheel-drive variant, which can be appealing for those needing extra traction in varying weather conditions. Also available in manual and CVT (continuously variable transmission), the Swift provides a smooth and responsive driving experience.

Fabia

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Ultimately, the choice between the Skoda Fabia and Suzuki Swift will depend heavily on consumer priorities. The Fabia impresses with its powerful engines, spacious interior, and strong performance, making it ideal for those needing a versatile hatchback. Conversely, the Swift excels in fuel efficiency and environmental concerns, making it an excellent option for users seeking lower running costs and eco-friendliness.

Both vehicles are worthy contenders in the compact hatchback segment, and your choice will hinge on your personal requirements and driving habits. A test drive is highly recommended to see which model resonates with you the most.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Swift

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Swift is marginally cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Skoda Fabia costs 17,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 163 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swift uses 4.4 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Skoda Fabia with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia offers considerably more power – delivering 177 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Fabia delivers clearly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 138 Nm more.

Swift

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is very slightly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,143 kg. The difference is around 74 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Fabia carries clearly more – 437 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 141 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Fabia is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Fabia

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 80 - 177 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
details
Suzuki Swift
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Ignis and the Swift boils down to whether you want a feisty, high-riding city crossover with extra practicality or a more composed, sportier hatch with sharper handling. The Ignis stands out for its compact SUV character and clever packaging, while the Swift delivers a peppier …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
Skoda Fabia
Toyota Yaris
VS
Deciding between the Škoda Fabia and the Toyota Yaris? Both are accomplished small hatchbacks, with the Fabia prioritizing interior space and value while the Yaris focuses on reliability and fuel efficiency.
Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
Two icons of the small-car world go head-to-head: the Skoda Fabia, the bargain-minded all-rounder, takes on the VW Golf, the class benchmark for driving refinement and pedigree. We’ll compare space, tech, engines and running costs to tell buyers which one delivers the best balance of value, comfort …
Hyundai i20
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Hyundai i20 is the sassy, tech-packed choice — peppy engines, crisp looks and a surprisingly upscale cabin for the money — while the Škoda Fabia plays the practical trump card with cavernous boot space, calm manners and a build-for-the-long-haul sensibility. If you want style and gadgetry that …
SEAT Ibiza
Skoda Fabia
VS
The SEAT Ibiza brings snap, youthful styling and engaging handling that makes town driving feel like a mini hot hatch, while the Škoda Fabia answers with roomy practicality, clever storage and a smoother, more accomplished everyday ride. Pick the Ibiza if you want flair and fun; choose the Fabia if …
Fiat 500
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Fiat 500 and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prefer retro Italian charm and compact city style or a more practical, versatile hatchback with sharper handling. This comparison looks at space, fuel economy, driving feel, equipment and running costs to help you decide …
Suzuki Swift
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
98 - 110 g/km
co2
112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,735 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
282 - 296 kg
Payload
402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
82 HP
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
112 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
61 kW
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Skoda
Is the Suzuki Swift offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.