Compare performance (82 HP vs 226 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swift or VW ID.Polo?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Suzuki Swift is clearly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the VW ID.Polo costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,282 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.Polo offers clearly more power – delivering 226 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 144 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW ID.Polo delivers considerably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 178 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is significantly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,568 kg. The difference is around 499 kg.
When it comes to payload, the VW ID.Polo carries noticeably more – 444 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 148 kg.
The VW ID.Polo is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
detailsThe VW ID.Polo brings classic Polo sensibility to the EV age with a calm, refined ride, an unusually large boot, and refreshingly simple controls with real buttons. It favors easygoing efficiency and family-friendly practicality over playful handling or high-speed autobahn pace, and the smaller-battery versions ask for a bit more planning on long trips.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
|
Price
21,400 - 36,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.3 - 14.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
424 - 454 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
|
Curb weight
1,568 - 1,635 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
441 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,735 mm
|
Width
1,816 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Payload
444 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 226 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
Torque
290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 166 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
VW
|