VS

Tesla Model S vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (1,020 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (94,300 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Tesla Model S or Mazda CX-6e?

Tesla Model S vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Tesla Model S

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-6e

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Model S

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-6e is considerably cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Tesla Model S costs 94,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 51,429 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model S is somewhat more efficient: consuming 16.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Tesla Model S offers clearly more range – reaching up to 744 km, about 260 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model S offers substantially more power – delivering 1,020 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 762 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model S is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 2.1 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 5.8 s quicker.

Model S

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Tesla Model S is barely lighter – 2,092 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model S offers clearly more boot space – 799 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 331 L.

When it comes to payload, the Tesla Model S carries moderately more – 442 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Tesla Model S stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £94,300
Model S

Tesla Model S

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 670 - 1,020 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.8 - 18 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 611 - 744 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Tesla Model S
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Tesla Model S

The Tesla Model S glides like a luxury sedan from the future, delivering instant shove and serene highway composure that make it feel equally at home on a rush-hour commute or a long-distance cruise. Inside, its minimalist cabin and gadget-forward interface turn every drive into a tech demo, making it as much a statement piece as a practical choice — and one that still manages to feel a little bit magical.

details
0x0-ModelS_01
0x0-ModelS_04
0x0-ModelS_03
0x0-ModelS_17
0x0-ModelS_07
0x0-ModelSPlaid-2
0x0-ModelS_16

Reviews Tesla Model S

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
jp Breugem
16 Dec 2025, 09:38:32

Reliable — now with nearly 400,000 km on the Model S, I’ve experienced few to no problems. Still using free Supercharging, it delivers a dependable, luxurious driving experience. Average consumption about 16 kWh/100 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Peter
27 Jul 2026, 17:46:47

Quality is a top priority at Mazda. No engine problems like with some other manufacturers in the past. Why should it be any different as an electric car.
The equipment focuses on the essentials… Great battery..
Visually very nice…
Will shake up the upper echelons of the car market at that price..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Kia EV3
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Choosing between the Kia EV3 and the Mazda CX-6e comes down to what you value most — practicality, range and efficiency, or driving engagement and a more premium cabin. The EV3 leans toward efficient electric practicality and strong value, while the CX-6e emphasizes Mazda’s signature driving …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
Kia EV5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Kia EV5 and Mazda CX-6e pits two fresh electric crossovers from established brands against each other, each promising a mix of range, tech and everyday practicality. This quick head-to-head will help you see which suits your driving needs and lifestyle better.
Skoda Enyaq
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Mazda CX-6e go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Enyaq or the Mazda …
Tesla Model S
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
Price
94,300 - 102,800 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 18 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
611 - 744 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,092 - 2,197 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
799 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
5,021 mm
Length
-
Width
1,987 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
1,431 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,828 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
432 - 442 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
670 - 1,020 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.1 - 3.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
240 - 322 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
493 - 750 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Tesla
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Tesla Model S have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.