@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Toyota bZ4X vs Volvo XC40 – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Toyota bZ4X or Volvo XC40?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

bZ4X @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo XC40 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Toyota bZ4X costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 9 £.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota bZ4X has a clearly edge – offering 343 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 146 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota bZ4X is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.10 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC40 performs to a small extent better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Toyota bZ4X tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota bZ4X pulls to a small extent stronger with 338 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 38 Nm difference.

bZ4X @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is slightly lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1970 kg. The difference is around 282 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 452 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 hardly perceptible takes the win – 532 kg compared to 495 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Toyota bZ4X shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
bZ4X @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota bZ4X

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.5 - 16.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 444 - 568 km
details

Toyota bZ4X

The Toyota bZ4X is a fresh, roomy electric crossover that pairs Toyota’s trademark reliability with bold, angular styling and a cabin designed for everyday comfort. It may not chase headlines like some flashier rivals, but for buyers who want sensible electric motoring with practical packaging and a relaxed, confident ride, it’s an easy, pleasant choice.

details
74823-2021kf3bz4xhigh003-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation
74824-2021kf3bz4xhigh004-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation
74825-2021kf3bz4xhigh005-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation
74838-2021kf3bz4xinteriorhigh002-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation
74840-2021kf3bz4xinteriorhigh004-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation
74851-2021kf3bz4xinteriorhigh015-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Volvo XC40

5 (2)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Toyota bZ4X
Volvo XC40
bZ4X @ Toyota Motor Corporation
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 48000 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.5 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
444 - 568 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1970 - 2180 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
452 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4690 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1860 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1600 - 1650 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
375 - 495 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.1 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
140 - 160 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
265 - 338 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia EV3
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota bZ4X
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Kia EV3 and Toyota bZ4X showcase their strengths in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market. The Kia EV3 impresses with its bold design and cutting-edge technology, while the bZ4X shines with Toyota's renowned reliability and spacious interior. As both models …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota bZ4X
VS
The Ford Explorer EV and Toyota bZ4X represent two distinct approaches to the burgeoning electric SUV market. The Explorer EV impresses with its spacious interior and robust tech features, aiming to attract families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the bZ4X stands out with its eco-friendly …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda HR-V
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda HR-V stands out for its versatile cargo space and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced safety features, appealing to those seeking …
Is the Toyota bZ4X offered with different drivetrains?

The Toyota bZ4X is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.