VS

Toyota bZ4X vs Volvo XC60 – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Toyota bZ4X meets Volvo XC60.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

bZ4X @ Toyota

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota bZ4X has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 12420 £.

As for range, the Toyota bZ4X performs clearly better – achieving up to 568 km, about 486 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60 @ media.volvocars.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 455 HP compared to 343 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Toyota bZ4X takes 5.10 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC60 performs to a small extent better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Toyota bZ4X tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls clearly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 371 Nm difference.

bZ4X @ Toyota

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is slight lighter – 1900 kg compared to 1970 kg. The difference is around 70 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers minimal more room – 483 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 31 L.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 barely noticeable takes the win – 550 kg compared to 495 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo XC60 shows itself to be edges out slightly and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £49,200
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Toyota bZ4X

The Toyota bZ4X represents a bold step forward in the brand's commitment to electric mobility, showcasing an innovative design that merges futuristic aesthetics and functionality. Inside, the spacious cabin is thoughtfully crafted to provide comfort and advanced technology, ensuring a pleasurable driving experience. With its impressive range and sustainable vision, the bZ4X sets a new benchmark for environmentally conscious driving without compromising on performance or style.

details
74823-2021kf3bz4xhigh003-web-lr @ Toyota
74824-2021kf3bz4xhigh004-web-lr @ Toyota
74825-2021kf3bz4xhigh005-web-lr @ Toyota
74838-2021kf3bz4xinteriorhigh002-web-lr @ Toyota
74840-2021kf3bz4xinteriorhigh004-web-lr @ Toyota
74851-2021kf3bz4xinteriorhigh015-web-lr @ Toyota

Volvo XC60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC60 strikes a perfect balance between contemporary design and practical functionality, making it an appealing choice for those in search of a reliable and stylish SUV. Its interior showcases a blend of high-quality materials and innovative technology, ensuring a comfortable and seamless driving experience. With its emphasis on safety and environmental sustainability, the XC60 continues to stand out in the competitive SUV market.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ media.volvocars.com
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior @ media.volvocars.com
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a versatile SUV for both urban and adventurous lifestyles. Ultimately, both vehicles offer unique strengths, catering to different preferences in the competitive midsize SUV market.
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the head-to-head comparison of the Volvo XC60 and Lynk & Co 08, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table. The Volvo XC60 stands out with its time-tested reputation for safety and luxury, offering a refined driving experience and robust build quality. On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 08, leveraging its youthful brand ethos, impresses with its modern connectivity features and a distinctive, daring design that aims to capture the attention of tech-savvy drivers.
Toyota bZ4X
Volvo XC60
bZ4X
XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 48000 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.5 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
444 - 568 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1970 - 2180 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
452 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4690 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1860 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1600 - 1650 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Payload
375 - 495 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.1 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
140 - 160 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
265 - 338 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 each bring their unique strengths to the table. The RAV4 excels with its reliability and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families who prioritize practicality. In contrast, the XC60 offers a luxurious experience with advanced safety features and a refined design, appealing to those who seek a more premium driving experience.
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, the Volvo XC60 impresses with its emphasis on safety features and Scandinavian design, appealing to buyers looking for both security and aesthetics in their driving experience.
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a higher driving position and ample space, making it the ideal choice for those seeking versatility without compromising on elegance.
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC60 and VW Tiguan stand out with their unique offerings. The XC60 boasts cutting-edge safety features and a luxurious interior, making it a favorite for those prioritizing comfort and security. Meanwhile, the Tiguan impresses with its spaciousness and versatility, appealing to families in need of practicality without sacrificing style.
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. Ultimately, buyers seeking practicality may lean towards the Kuga, while those prioritizing comfort and prestige might favor the Volvo.
Kia EV3
Toyota bZ4X
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Kia EV3 and Toyota bZ4X showcase their strengths in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market. The Kia EV3 impresses with its bold design and cutting-edge technology, while the bZ4X shines with Toyota's renowned reliability and spacious interior. As both models aim to capture the interest of eco-conscious drivers, the choice ultimately hinges on personal preferences for style and functionality.
Renault Rafale
Volvo XC60
VS
BYD Seal U
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the BYD Seal U and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles showcase impressive features tailored to different driving preferences. The BYD Seal U offers an attractive blend of cutting-edge electric technology and spacious interior, making it ideal for eco-conscious buyers. Conversely, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its luxurious design and advanced safety features, appealing to those who value comfort and reliability in their driving experience.
Is the Toyota bZ4X offered with different drivetrains?

The Toyota bZ4X is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.