Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Toyota C-HR vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Which model is better for everyday use?
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Toyota C-HR or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque fits your lifestyle better.
C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota C-HR has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £. That’s a price difference of around 14151 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota C-HR manages with 0.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 2.90 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Toyota C-HR performs a bit better – achieving up to 68 km, about 8 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a a bit edge – offering 269 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs slightly better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 33 km/h.
C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Toyota C-HR is to a small extent lighter – 1505 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 287 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers slight more room – 472 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs barely noticeable better – up to 1156 L, which is about 1 L more than the Toyota C-HR.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque clearly perceptible takes the win – 600 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Toyota C-HR proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Toyota C-HR is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £29,100
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Toyota C-HR
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 42800 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
17 - 115 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4362 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1832 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drivetrain options does the Toyota C-HR have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.