Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Toyota C-HR vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (223 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota C-HR or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Toyota C-HR vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
C-HR
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Toyota C-HR is significantly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,151 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 67 km, about 1 km more than the Toyota C-HR.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers a bit more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
C-HR
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is a bit lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 287 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers barely more boot space – 472 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries noticeably more – 600 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota C-HR is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £29,100
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Toyota C-HR
The Toyota C-HR wraps efficient hybrid drivetrains in dramatic, European‑tuned styling and a noticeably upmarket cabin, delivering composed ride quality and easy city manners that suit style‑minded commuters and company drivers. Accept a tighter, dim rear seat, a fiddly high‑lip boot and occasional CVT grumble plus persistent warning chimes, and you get a very economical, confident little crossover that prizes individuality over outright practicality.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Toyota C-HR
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.