VS

Toyota C-HR vs VW Polo comparison

Compare performance (223 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota C-HR or VW Polo?

Toyota C-HR vs VW Polo: Key differences

Toyota C-HR

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C-HR

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW Polo is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,876 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the VW Polo with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.

Polo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers very slightly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

C-HR

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW Polo is visibly lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 362 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers noticeably more boot space – 447 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 96 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW Polo carries only slightly more – 457 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
C-HR

Toyota C-HR

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 223 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 66 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross comes down to whether you prefer the C-HR’s sharper styling and firmer, more engaging ride or the Yaris Cross’s roomier practicality and better efficiency. I’ll compare their driving feel, interior comfort, fuel economy, and features to …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla comes down to whether you want a compact crossover's higher driving position and distinctive styling or a traditional compact car's practicality and efficiency. The C-HR emphasizes bold looks and a more SUV-like feel, while the Corolla …
Toyota C-HR
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Jan
16 May 2026, 20:51:01

Great driving comfort, admittedly short trips, but above all a cool impression.

Rav is for wimps.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Polo

The Polo is a well-built, comfortable hatchback that blends a refined cabin and composed manners into a compact package. It's easy to live with day to day, offering sensible space, tidy controls and reassuring quality that make it a practical choice for city or longer trips.

details
DB2021AU00726_medium
DB2021AU00728_medium
DB2021AU00732_medium
DB2021AU00735_medium
DB2021AU00736_medium
DB2021AU00741_medium

Reviews VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Michel
13 Jun 2026, 15:24:46

Nice, spacious car with many options available (panoramic roof and travel assist).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers with similar footprints but aimed at different buyers. The LBX prioritizes premium materials, a quieter ride and upscale features, while the C-HR emphasizes bold styling, engaging handling and stronger value for money.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports comes down to whether you value the C-HR’s bold crossover styling and city-friendly agility or the Corolla Touring Sports’ practical estate space and relaxed long-distance comfort. This comparison will cover driving feel, …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers who want agile packaging and distinctive style. The UX leans on Lexus-level refinement and a premium cabin, while the C-HR emphasizes bolder styling and strong value for money.
VW Polo
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Polo is the sharp, no-nonsense hatchback that nails everyday practicality — nimble in town, economical to run and pleasantly composed on the motorway. The VW Taigo swaps a bit of luggage room and rear headroom for SUV flair, higher seating and a more eye-catching cabin, so pick the Polo for …
VW Golf
VW Polo
VS
The Volkswagen Golf and Volkswagen Polo are two of the brand’s best-known hatchbacks, with the Golf leaning toward greater space, refinement and tech while the Polo focuses on affordability, city-friendly size and economy. This comparison will show where the Golf justifies its extra cost and where …
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota C-HR
VS
Choose the Nissan Qashqai if you want a sensible, roomy compact SUV that puts comfort, practicality and a grown-up cockpit ahead of flash; pick the Toyota C‑HR if you crave jaw‑dropping design, a taut chassis and the option of frugal hybrid running—at the cost of rear-seat space and a firmer ride. …
Toyota C-HR
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Price
17,300 - 30,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
66 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
52 - 116 g/km
co2
116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,378 kg
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,832 mm
Width
1,751 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 425 kg
Payload
432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Toyota
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Toyota C-HR have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.