Compare performance (442 HP vs 324 HP), boot space and price (46,500 £ vs 34,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or BYD Seal U?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
BYD Seal U is noticeably cheaper – starting at 34,300 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,257 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the BYD Seal U is clearly more efficient: consuming 12.1 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 4.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EC40 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 85 km more than the BYD Seal U.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 324 HP. That’s roughly 118 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the BYD Seal U takes 5.9 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers a bit more torque with 670 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Seal U is barely lighter – 1,940 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BYD Seal U offers noticeably more boot space – 552 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 148 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EC40 carries barely more – 435 kg compared to 410 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
The Volvo EC40 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
detailsThe BYD Seal U is a sleek electric fastback that blends sporty styling with a roomy, tech-focused interior, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric performance without sacrificing comfort. It delivers a smooth, composed ride and intuitive features, positioning it as a practical yet modern option in the EV market.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
|
Price
34,300 - 39,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.1 - 20.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
Electric Range
70 - 500 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 71 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
Curb weight
1,940 - 2,147 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
Trunk capacity
425 - 552 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Payload
410 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
Power HP
218 - 324 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
Power kW
160 - 238 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,497 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
BYD
|