VS

Volvo EC40 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (46,600 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

Volvo EC40 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • marginally lighter

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • only slightly more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EC40

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo EC40 is barely cheaper – starting at 46,600 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,808 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EC40 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 16.2 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 1.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 16 km more than the Volvo EC40.

Mustang Mach-E

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers barely more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Volvo EC40 takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers markedly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is marginally lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers noticeably more boot space – 519 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries marginally more – 450 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri is pure 1970s charisma — a lightweight, analogue coupe that thrills with raw charm and classic looks but asks you to forgive creature comforts, modern safety tech and everyday reliability. By contrast the Ford Mustang Mach‑E slaps Mustang attitude onto an electric, family-friendly …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Volvo EC40
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric

Reviews Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
In the latest head-to-head comparison of the Volvo EC40 and EX40, enthusiasts will appreciate the subtle design differences and performance variations that set these two electric models apart. While the EC40 leans toward a more rugged, SUV-like stance, the EX40 offers a sleek, urban vibe with its …
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
Volvo EC40 and Volvo XC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
CUPRA Tavascan
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
In a thrilling showdown between the CUPRA Tavascan and the Ford Mustang Mach-E, both electric SUVs bring their own unique flair to the table. The Tavascan impresses with its striking design and sporty performance, making it a compelling choice for those seeking an exhilarating driving experience. …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Hyundai IONIQ 6
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the Hyundai IONIQ 6 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the BYD Sealion 7 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EC40
VS
In the burgeoning realm of electric SUVs, both the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo XC40 Recharge stand as titans of innovation and design. The Q4 e-tron offers a sophisticated driving experience with its sleek aesthetics and intuitive technology package, whereas the XC40 Recharge matches its elegance …
Volvo EC40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo EC40 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Volvo EC40
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption
Price
46,600 - 59,000 £
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Electric Range
488 - 584 km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Trunk capacity
404 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
4,440 mm
Length
-
Width
1,873 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Height
1,591 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,196 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 435 kg
Payload
368 - 450 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Ford
Is the Volvo EC40 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.