Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Volvo EC40 vs Toyota bZ4X comparison
Compare performance (442 HP vs 380 HP), boot space and price (46,500 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or Toyota bZ4X?
Volvo EC40 vs Toyota bZ4X: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EC40
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Toyota bZ4X is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,686 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota bZ4X is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13.5 kWh/100km compared to 16.2 kWh/100km for the Volvo EC40. That’s a difference of about 2.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Toyota bZ4X offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 591 km, about 6 km more than the Volvo EC40.
bZ4X
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers slightly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 380 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota bZ4X is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Volvo EC40 takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 332 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota bZ4X is only slightly lighter – 1,900 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 165 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota bZ4X offers markedly more boot space – 669 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 265 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota bZ4X carries visibly more – 565 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 130 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota bZ4X is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,800
Toyota bZ4X
Volvo EC40
Toyota bZ4X
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
details
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X is an electric crossover that focuses on a calm ride, practical interior and predictable handling for everyday driving. It suits buyers who want an easygoing, reliable EV with Toyota's familiar build quality and a clean, simple design.
details
Volvo EC40
Toyota bZ4X
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
|
Price
36,800 - 51,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
Electric Range
444 - 591 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,180 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 - 669 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Payload
375 - 565 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
Power HP
167 - 380 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
Power kW
123 - 280 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.