Compare performance (340 HP vs 380 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Toyota bZ4X?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving world of electric vehicles, the SUV segment has seen remarkable advances. Two of the newest entrants, the Skoda Enyaq and the Toyota bZ4X, present compelling options for those seeking an eco-friendly ride without sacrificing space and comfort. Let's dive into the details and see how these two electric SUVs stack up against each other.
At first glance, both the Skoda Enyaq and the Toyota bZ4X share similarities in their all-electric architecture, but differences emerge when we examine their performance metrics. The Skoda Enyaq offers a variety of power options ranging from 204 HP to a robust 340 HP, whereas the Toyota bZ4X provides power outputs of 204 HP to 218 HP. This array of choices allows Enyaq buyers to select a powertrain that best suits their driving preferences.
Acceleration is another key consideration, with the Enyaq accelerating from 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds in its highest-performing variant, compared to the bZ4X, which achieves this sprint in 6.9 seconds at its quickest. Both models cap their speeds at 160 km/h, a typical limitation in electric SUVs to maximize range and efficiency.
Efficiency is the heart of electric vehicle appeal. Here, the Toyota bZ4X shines with a consumption of as low as 14.4 kWh/100 km, whereas the Enyaq's consumption varies between 14.6 and 16.4 kWh/100 km. Despite this, the Enyaq offers a slightly longer electric range, capable of achieving up to 587 km on a full charge, surpassing the bZ4X's maximum range of 513 km.
Both SUVs maintain practicality with their five-door, five-seat configurations. The Skoda Enyaq outmuscles the bZ4X in cargo capacity, with a trunk space of 585 liters compared to Toyota’s 452 liters. Such space efficiency in the Enyaq makes it a practical choice for families or adventurous outings.
In terms of dimensions, the Enyaq measures slightly more compactly in width at 1879 mm, compared to the bZ4X's 1860 mm, but it is shorter in height around 1600 mm versus the 1622 mm of Enyaq, providing a more planted stance for the Toyota. Overall length, however, sees the bZ4X extending longer at 4690 mm versus Enyaq’s varied lengths around 4658 mm.
Both SUVs earn a CO2 Efficiency Class of 'A', underscoring their commitment to sustainable motoring with zero tailpipe emissions. They employ a reduction gearbox transmission and are available in different drive configurations. The Enyaq provides choices between rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive, while the bZ4X comes equipped with either front-wheel or all-wheel drive setups.
The Skoda Enyaq and Toyota bZ4X cater to different slices of the electric SUV market. Enyaq's strength lies in its range and performance variety, while the bZ4X excels in consumption efficiency and sleek dimensions. Potential buyers should consider their priorities — whether they favor extended range, performance, or cargo space — to find the SUV that best aligns with their lifestyle. As electric technology continues to develop, the competition between models like these will only become fiercer, promising even more exciting advancements in the near future.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Toyota bZ4X is somewhat cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,066 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota bZ4X is very slightly more efficient: consuming 13.5 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 1.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Toyota bZ4X offers marginally more range – reaching up to 591 km, about 4 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota bZ4X offers somewhat more power – delivering 380 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota bZ4X is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 341 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota bZ4X is slightly lighter – 1,900 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 279 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeably more boot space – 585 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 133 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota bZ4X carries a bit more – 565 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.
The Toyota bZ4X has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
The Toyota bZ4X is a fresh, roomy electric crossover that pairs Toyota’s trademark reliability with bold, angular styling and a cabin designed for everyday comfort. It may not chase headlines like some flashier rivals, but for buyers who want sensible electric motoring with practical packaging and a relaxed, confident ride, it’s an easy, pleasant choice.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
Price
36,800 - 51,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
444 - 591 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,180 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Payload
375 - 565 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
167 - 380 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
123 - 280 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España