VS

Volvo EX90 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (680 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (72,200 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX90 or Mazda CX-80?

Volvo EX90 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX90

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is considerably cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,834 £.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 560 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 353 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers visibly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.

EX90

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is somewhat lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 424 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries barely more – 650 kg compared to 605 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX90 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 570 - 620 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX90
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo EX60 are Volvo's all-electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the EX90 is the flagship full-size model focused on maximum space, safety and cutting-edge tech, while the EX60 is a mid-size alternative that prioritizes efficiency, agility and value. This comparison cuts …
Volvo EX90
Volvo ES90
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo ES90 are Volvo's newest premium electric models, each showcasing the brand's focus on safety, luxury and advanced electrified powertrains. The EX90 is the flagship electric SUV while the ES90 delivers similar technology in a more traditional sedan/fastback form, so your …
Volvo EX90
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

details
305698_Volvo_EX90
305699_Volvo_EX90
305702_Volvo_EX90
305707_Volvo_EX90
305714_Volvo_EX90
305743_Volvo_EX90

Reviews Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
CHD
22 Apr 2026, 11:15:18

Full of faults — at least every other day there's something that needs to be fixed. Consumption 24 kWh/100 km in summer; in winter the range is half of what was promised. The safety would be good if the promised features actually worked.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
BMW iX3
Volvo EX90
VS
Unsure whether the BMW iX3 or the Volvo EX90 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
BYD Tang
Volvo EX90
VS
In the increasingly competitive electric SUV market, the BYD Tang and Volvo EX90 stand out with their unique blend of performance and technology. The Tang impresses with its spacious interior and strong range, appealing to families seeking practicality without compromising on style. Meanwhile, the …
Volvo EX90
Volvo XC90
VS
Volvo EX90 and Volvo XC90 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Volvo EX90
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
6 - 7
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,964 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
545 - 605 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Mazda
Is the Volvo EX90 offered with different drivetrains?

The Volvo EX90 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.