@ Volvo Cars
VS

Volvo XC40 vs Lynk & Co 08 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (197 HP vs 349 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 48000 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC40 or Lynk & Co 08?

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Lynk & Co 08

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Volvo XC40 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Lynk & Co 08 costs 48000 £. That’s a price difference of around 11233 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lynk & Co 08 manages with 0.90 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 5.60 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 08 has a convincingly edge – offering 349 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 152 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Lynk & Co 08 takes 7.70 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Lynk & Co 08 performs slight better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers clearly more room – 452 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 452 L.

Who wins the race?

The Lynk & Co 08 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Lynk & Co 08 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,000
default

Lynk & Co 08

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 349 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.90 L
  • Electric Range : 200 km
details
Volvo XC40
Lynk & Co 08

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Lynk & Co 08

The Lynk & Co 08 represents a bold leap in automotive design, merging a sleek and modern exterior with a spacious and tech-savvy interior that caters to the needs of contemporary drivers. Its innovative approach to connectivity and user experience sets it apart in a crowded market, offering drivers an unparalleled level of interaction and customization. With a strong focus on sustainability, this model features advanced hybrid technology, underscoring Lynk & Co's commitment to eco-friendly driving solutions.

details

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Lynk & Co 08

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Volvo XC40
Lynk & Co 08
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Price
48000 - 51400 £
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption L/100km
0.90 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
200 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
147 - 148 g/km
co2
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1688 kg
Curb weight
-
Trunk capacity
452 L
Trunk capacity
0 L
Length
4425 mm
Length
4820 mm
Width
1863 mm
Width
-
Height
1652 mm
Height
1690 mm
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
532 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Power HP
349 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.70 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Power kW
257 kW
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
Engine capacity
1499 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Lynk & Co

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
ZEEKR 7X
Lynk & Co 08
VS
ZEEKR 7X arrives like a tech-startup in SUV clothing — taut lines, a minimalist interior and a cockpit that screams "future", while the Lynk & Co 08 plays the confident road mate with chunkier styling, roomier practicality and a comfort-first setup. On the road the ZEEKR feels sharper and more …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Seal U
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The BYD Seal U feels like a sleek, tech‑forward EV with impressive performance-to-price ratio, while the Lynk & Co 08 plays the role of bold, spacious SUV that prioritizes comfort and presence. If you want sporty agility and cutting‑edge battery tech, go Seal U; if you need family practicality, …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.