VS

Volvo XC40 vs Skoda Elroq comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC40 or Skoda Elroq?

Volvo XC40 vs Skoda Elroq: Key differences

Volvo XC40

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably lighter
details

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • considerably more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

XC40

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the compact segment has seen significant competition, presenting consumers with diverse options that balance performance, utility, and innovative technology. In this comparison, we take a closer look at the Volvo XC40 and the Skoda Elroq, two models that embody the essence of modern SUV engineering while catering to distinct driving preferences.

Elroq

Design and Dimensions

The Volvo XC40 boasts a sleek Scandinavian design language characterized by its bold front grille and distinctive LED headlights. Measuring 4425mm in length, 1863mm in width, and standing at 1652mm tall, it's designed for urban efficiency while maintaining a sophisticated presence. The car's balanced proportions and angular lines scream modernity, appealing to those who appreciate a refined aesthetic.

On the other hand, the Skoda Elroq offers a slightly larger footprint with dimensions of 4488mm in length, 1884mm in width, and a height of 1625mm. The Elroq's design blends practicality with a robust look, integrating familiar Skoda traits like the upright grille and sharp lines, projecting a sense of adventure and capability.

XC40

Powertrains and Performance

When it comes to performance, the XC40 doesn't disappoint. Available with a petrol MHEV powertrain, it offers two outputs: a 163 HP variant and a more powerful 197 HP option. The front-wheel-drive system, coupled with a dual-clutch automatic transmission, provides an engaging driving experience with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 8.6 seconds for the lower output and 7.6 seconds for the more potent engine. With a maximum torque of 265 Nm in the base model and 300 Nm in the more powerful variant, it achieves a respectable balance of efficiency and responsiveness.

In contrast, the Skoda Elroq presents a distinct approach with its electric powertrains. Ranging from 170 HP to an impressive 285 HP, the Elroq features a rear-wheel-drive configuration and an acceleration time that can reach as low as 6.6 seconds from 0-100 km/h. The electric torque is also staggering, with the 285 HP variant offering a formidable 545 Nm of torque. In terms of efficiency, the Elroq shines with an electric consumption of 15.2 kWh/100km in its most efficient variant, making it an appealing choice for eco-conscious consumers.

Elroq

Range and Efficiency

Efficiency takes center stage in the electric Skoda Elroq. With a battery capacity ranging from 52 kWh to 77 kWh, it provides an electric range between 375 km and 580 km, making it suitable for both daily commuting and longer journeys. The fact that it emits zero CO2 while driving is a significant advantage in the age of increasing environmental awareness.

The Volvo XC40, while still efficient for a petrol vehicle, shows an average consumption of 6.5 L/100km for its petrol MHEV variants, corresponding to CO2 emissions of up to 148 g/km. Although it doesn't match the Elroq's zero-emission status, its range of performance options ensures it remains a viable choice for traditional SUV enthusiasts.

XC40

Interior, Technology, and Innovation

Moving into the interiors, both SUVs cater to a comfortable riding experience. The XC40 is adorned with premium materials and an intuitive infotainment system featuring the latest in-car technology, including voice recognition and smartphone integration. Its trunk capacity of 452 liters provides ample space for luggage or gear, enhancing its usability as a compact SUV.

Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq’s interior is equally impressive, focusing on practicality and modern tech. The spacious cabin allows for a flexible seating arrangement and a trunk capacity of 470 liters. Skoda’s commitment to technology shines through with features like a straightforward infotainment system, driver-assistance packages, and a robust set of safety measures.

Elroq

Final Thoughts

Both the Volvo XC40 and Skoda Elroq present compelling options within the compact SUV market. The XC40 appeals to those who prefer traditional petrol engines with a luxury edge, while the Elroq offers cutting-edge electric performance and efficiency, perfect for urban dwellers and environmentally conscious drivers alike.

Your choice ultimately hinges on preferences: the luxurious yet powerful Volvo XC40 or the innovative and eco-friendly Skoda Elroq. Regardless, both models reflect the current trends in automotive technology, ensuring that there is no compromise on style, comfort, or performance.

Video - Skoda Elroq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC40

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Elroq is a bit cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,037 £.

Elroq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers considerably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 143 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm more.

XC40

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC40 is noticeably lighter – 1,688 kg compared to 2,133 kg. The difference is around 445 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries marginally more – 532 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Elroq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.2 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 529 - 573 km
Volvo XC40
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a sensible, comfort‑focused compact electric SUV that puts a premium on a roomy rear seat, quiet long‑distance manners and straightforward, low‑distraction controls — perfect for families and commuters who value everyday usability. Its practical Simply‑Clever touches and strong value make it a convincing all‑rounder, though those chasing class‑leading fast charging or the most flexible boot space might look elsewhere.

details
Volvo XC40
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,900 - 46,100 £
Price
37,900 - 45,500 £
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
529 - 573 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
co2
148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Curb weight
2,133 - 2,265 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
470 L
Length
-
Length
4,488 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Width
1,884 mm
Height
-
Height
1,625 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,580 L
Payload
532 kg
Payload
467 - 525 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.