VS

Volvo XC60 vs Audi Q3 comparison

Compare performance (455 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (49,200 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Audi Q3?

Volvo XC60 vs Audi Q3: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • moderately lighter
  • barely more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

XC60

The Battle of Compact Luxury SUVs: Audi Q3 vs. Volvo XC60

In today’s automotive market, compact luxury SUVs are coveted for their perfect balance of style, comfort, and performance. Two prominent contenders in this category are the Audi Q3 and the Volvo XC60. Both models, updated for 2024, bring their own blend of technology and innovation to the table. Let’s delve into the specifics to find out which one better suits your driving preferences.

Q3

Performance and Engine Options

The Audi Q3 comes with a versatile range of engine options, including both petrol and diesel variants. Buyers can choose from power outputs ranging from 150 to 245 HP, with torque spanning 250 to 370 Nm. The Q3 can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 5.8 to 9.5 seconds, depending on the engine configuration. Its maximum speed peaks at 237 km/h. With a transmission choice between a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic, drivers have the option of a more personalized driving experience.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 provides a contemporary edge with its petrol mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. The power range is slightly higher, stretching from 250 to 455 HP, and torque ranges from 350 to 709 Nm. Impressively, the XC60 can sprint from 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. It features an all-wheel-drive system paired exclusively with an automatic gearbox, ensuring a smooth ride, whether you’re dealing with city commutes or country roads.

XC60

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Audi Q3 varies from 5.5 to 8.5 L/100 km, reflecting the diversity of its powertrain options. CO2 emissions range between 143 and 193 g/km, which falls within the E to G efficiency classes.

In contrast, the Volvo XC60 offers a significant advantage with its Plug-In Hybrid variant, boasting a consumption rate of just 0.9 L/100 km combined with an electric range of up to 80 km. CO2 emissions are notably low, at 22 g/km for the plug-in model, falling in the B efficiency class, making it an eco-conscious choice.

Q3

Interior Comfort and Space

Both SUVs provide spacious interiors with seating for five and host a plethora of luxury features. The Audi Q3 offers a trunk capacity of 530 liters, accommodating 475 to 495 kg of payload, depending on the configuration. It maintains a sleek profile with a length of roughly 4,500 mm, width of 1,843 mm, and height of 1,567 mm.

The Volvo XC60, meanwhile, offers a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 468 to 483 liters but compensates with a larger payload capacity of 510 to 550 kg. Its dimensions extend to a length of 4,688 mm, a width of 1,902 mm, and a height of 1,658 mm, demonstrating a more robust presence on the road.

XC60

Technological Innovations

The 2024 Audi Q3 integrates the latest in infotainment and driver assistance systems, featuring a sophisticated Virtual Cockpit and an array of safety features including lane assist and adaptive cruise control.

Volvo, known for its safety innovations, packs the XC60 with state-of-the-art tech, including a user-friendly touchscreen interface and advanced safety systems such as pilot assist and collision avoidance technology.

Q3

Conclusion

Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the Volvo XC60 boils down to personal preferences and priorities. The Audi Q3 stands out with a broader range of powertrain choices, offering a combination of traditional driving feel and modern efficiency. Conversely, the Volvo XC60 sets itself apart with superior fuel efficiency, particularly in its plug-in hybrid variant, along with advanced safety features.

Both vehicles deliver on luxury and performance, ensuring that prospective buyers will enjoy their ride regardless of the choice. As always, a test drive of both models is recommended to truly experience their unique qualities firsthand.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,963 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q3 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 37 km more than the Volvo XC60.

Q3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers significantly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 183 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.7 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers clearly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm more.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is moderately lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 265 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers barely more boot space – 488 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries marginally more – 550 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
details
Volvo XC60
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Audi Q3 dresses up compact-SUV practicality in premium polish — plush interior, refined ride and tech that whispers “grown-up” refinement. The CUPRA Terramar, by contrast, prowls with sharper handling, punchier engines and a sporty attitude that’ll make you smile even if the mpg takes a hit, so …
BMW iX3
Volvo XC60
VS
The BMW iX3 and Volvo XC60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Audi Q3
Audi Q4 e-tron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and Audi Q4 e-tron present distinct offerings tailored to different preferences. The Q3 impresses with its spirited performance and traditional gasoline engine, while the Q4 e-tron showcases Audi's commitment to electrification with a …
Volvo XC60
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 169 g/km
co2
39 - 195 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Length
4,708 mm
Length
-
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
1,655 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 - 550 kg
Payload
505 - 535 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Audi
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.