VS

Volvo XC60 vs Honda CR-V comparison

Compare performance (406 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (58,300 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Honda CR-V?

Volvo XC60 vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Honda CR-V

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

XC60

Honda CR-V VS Volvo XC60 — overview for buyers

Honda CR-V VS Volvo XC60 set two different tones in the mid‑size SUV market: the CR‑V leans toward roomy, practical family duty while the XC60 aims for a quieter, more premium travel experience. The Honda sells on usable space, a sensible control layout and hybrid practicality for everyday commuting, whereas the Volvo sells on materials, calm motorway refinement and a modern Google‑powered infotainment. Price and specification tends to push the XC60 into a more premium bracket, changing expectations about finish and equipment. Read on to see which of these trade‑offs matters more for your driving profile before you dive into the technical numbers.

CR-V

Character and driving manners

The Honda CR‑V feels composed and predictable, built around relaxed straight‑line stability and an undemanding hybrid drive that favours smoothness over drama, while the Volvo XC60 favours refined isolation and a hushed cabin that makes long runs feel effortless. The CR‑V’s manners encourage sensible family driving and confidence when you’re loaded with passengers and luggage, but you’ll notice more engine or wind intrusion at motorway speeds than in the Volvo. The XC60 suppresses road noise and soaks up long distances better, especially if you opt for the softer suspension setup, but it isn’t aimed at enthusiastic cornering. Choosing between them is a trade‑off: Honda for predictable, utilitarian composure; Volvo for serene, premium refinement.

XC60

Comfort, cabin feel and controls

Inside, the Volvo XC60 presents a classier, quieter ambience with premium materials and an airy feel that rewards time on the motorway, whereas the Honda CR‑V favours functional ergonomics and tactile controls that make day‑to‑day use less fiddly. The CR‑V’s physical buttons and straightforward layout reduce distraction and feel sensible with kids in the back, while the XC60’s Google‑centric touchscreen and voice tools modernise the interface but bury some climate and quick‑access controls. Noise, vibration and harshness tilt clearly toward Volvo for long journeys, but Honda’s seats and adjustable rear bench add genuine comfort flexibility for varied passengers. Both cabins are well made, but the XC60 trades a little usability for a more premium presence and the CR‑V trades some refinement for greater practicality.

CR-V

Practicality and family usability

The Honda CR‑V wins where space and everyday family utility matter: a sliding, adjustable rear bench, easier child‑seat access and a bigger, well‑shaped boot make packing and adapting the interior simpler. The Volvo XC60 offers excellent seat comfort and good rear space for two adults, but the middle seat and a higher load floor make it less flexible for three or for bulky cargo, and PHEV versions lose some luggage space. CR‑V drivers will appreciate simpler load‑throughs and lower lift‑over heights; XC60 owners get a neater, more refined cargo area but with less overall volume. In short, pick the CR‑V if you prioritise family adaptability and loading space, pick the XC60 if you prioritise premium touches and rear passenger comfort for two.

XC60

City manners and everyday usability

In town the Volvo XC60’s large windows, good cameras and light steering make parking and tight manoeuvres feel reassuring despite its size, while the Honda CR‑V delivers excellent forward visibility and easy access but can feel bulky in tight city garages and has a larger turning circle. Both PHEV variants offer useful electric city driving, but remember the practical gain only comes if you can regularly charge; otherwise that benefit fades. The CR‑V’s physical controls and simpler interface reduce daily friction, whereas the XC60’s touchscreen‑led climate and some deeper menus require adaptation. If urban convenience and straightforward daily routines are your priority, the CR‑V’s usability edges ahead; if stress‑free parking and a tranquil cabin for stop‑start commutes matter more, the XC60 will feel nicer.

CR-V

Buyer fit and the trade-offs to weigh before the specs

If your priority is maximum family space, flexible rear seating and a workaday interior that survives kids and luggage, the Honda CR‑V is the practical choice; it suits buyers who want useful features and easy daily life without fuss. If you prize a premium cabin, very low in‑cabin noise on motorways, and a modern connected interface that feels upmarket, the Volvo XC60 better matches that brief, at the cost of less boot space and a higher purchase price. Consider whether you will consistently plug in a PHEV—both cars reward charging, but the practical gains and packaging penalties differ between them. The next technical section breaks down power, efficiency and cargo figures so you can match those concrete numbers to the usage patterns described here.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Honda CR-V is clearly cheaper – starting at 40,200 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,077 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Honda CR-V with 2.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 79 km, about 1 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 222 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers substantially more torque with 669 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 334 Nm more.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is a bit lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 329 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries marginally more – 510 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 79 km
details
Volvo XC60
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Henk van der Werf
1 Jun 2026, 20:15:51

The fuel economy you report in your test is, of course, nonsense. This is a plug-in, and so you're being fooled. Of course a CR‑V isn't more economical than an HR‑V. Think!

Roger
23 May 2026, 22:21:51

My 2026 CR‑V hybrid has had no problems. It’s quieter than my previous 2019 RAV4 hybrid. The exterior finish feels more solid across the whole vehicle. It’s less affected by crosswinds. I prefer the CR‑V’s driving. Its only drawback is that it uses just a little more fuel than the RAV4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marek
19 May 2026, 07:08:56

Very comfortable, lots of space, combined fuel consumption about 6 l, reliable, simple to operate, without unnecessary gadgets, very well made, easy to drive, a car for the city and long trips.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
The Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V are close relatives but aim at different buyers: the CR-V emphasizes roomy comfort and family-friendly practicality, while the ZR-V focuses on a more compact, engaging package for urban and active drivers. This comparison will run through size, driving character, fuel …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
BMW X1
Volvo XC60
VS
Deciding between the BMW X1 and the Volvo XC60 is essentially a choice between a sportier, more driver-focused compact SUV and a roomier, comfort-and-safety-oriented mid‑size contender. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving dynamics, fuel economy and running costs to help you pick the …
Honda Jazz
Honda CR-V
VS
The Honda Jazz and Honda CR‑V target very different buyers: the Jazz is a clever, compact hatch ideal for city drivers who value efficiency and smart packaging, while the CR‑V is a roomier compact SUV built for families and longer trips. I’ll compare their space, fuel efficiency, driving feel, …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 are two leading compact SUVs that serve similar needs but with distinct priorities: the RAV4 emphasizes value, reliability and fuel efficiency, while the XC60 leans toward premium comfort, advanced safety tech and a more refined driving experience. Choosing between …
Volvo XC60
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 km
Electric Range
78 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 g/km
co2
59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Honda
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.