VS

Volvo XC60 vs Honda CR-V comparison

Compare performance (455 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (49,200 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Honda CR-V?

Volvo XC60 vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • marginally more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

XC60

Honda CR-V vs. Volvo XC60: A Clash of Titans in the SUV Segment

The battle in the midsize SUV arena is fiercer than ever, with the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 both bringing innovative features and impressive performance to the table. These two 2024 models represent a blend of versatility, technology, and engineering prowess making it difficult for prospective buyers to decide which to park in their garages. Let's delve into the technical details and see how these models stack up against each other.

CR-V

Engine Performance and Efficiency

Both the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 offer hybrid variants catering to the increasing demand for greener vehicles. The 2024 Honda CR-V is available with both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. With a power output of 184 HP and torque of 335 Nm, it promises a reliable and efficient driving experience. The CR-V's fuel efficiency stands out, offering consumption as low as 6.7 L/100km for the hybrid and an impressive electric range of up to 79 km, ensuring fewer stops at the fuel station.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 provides more robust engine options, boasting up to a thrilling 455 HP for its plug-in hybrid variant. The XC60 accelerates from 0 to 100km/h in as little as 4.9 seconds, a testament to its powerful 659 Nm torque with a CO2 efficiency that varies strikingly between F and B class efficiency ratings, depending on the choice of engine. Its electric range mirrors that of the CR-V at 80 km, allowing for efficient short-distance rides.

XC60

Transmission and Drive

The Honda CR-V employs a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) which is praised for its smooth acceleration and seamless shifting, contributing to its efficient fuel consumption. Additionally, prospective buyers have the choice between All-Wheel Drive and Front-Wheel Drive layouts, providing flexibility depending on driving conditions and personal preference.

Volvo, conversely, equips the XC60 with an automatic gearbox that enhances its refined driving dynamics. Its commitment to performance is demonstrated through the standard All-Wheel Drive option, offering a stable and controlled driving experience across various terrains.

CR-V

Size, Capacity, and Utility

Size-wise, the Honda CR-V and Volvo XC60 offer similar dimensions, with only subtle variations. The CR-V measures 4706 mm in length, marginally longer than the XC60's 4688 mm. The CR-V further provides a more spacious trunk capacity ranging from 579 to 617 liters, compared to the XC60's 468 to 483 liters, making the CR-V slightly more versatile for cargo.

Although slightly heavier, the XC60's robust build affords a more substantial payload capacity of up to 550 kg, compared to the CR-V's maximum of 475 kg, which could be pivotal for users requiring increased hauling capabilities.

XC60

Luxury, Comfort, and Innovation

Both vehicles shine in interior comfort and innovative technologies, offering seating for five. Honda's CR-V focuses on delivering utility and reliability, incorporating a comfortable interior space enhanced by modern infotainment systems. Volvo’s XC60 takes a step further, typically incorporating an array of luxury features and advanced safety technologies, staying true to its reputation for putting driver and passenger comfort at the forefront, with options for premium sound systems and cutting-edge driver-assistance technologies.

CR-V

Conclusion

Choosing between the Honda CR-V and Volvo XC60 boils down to individual preferences for power, utility, and brand value. The Honda CR-V is well-suited for those who prioritize efficiency and practicality, while the Volvo XC60 is an ideal choice for drivers seeking luxury, performance, and cutting-edge technology. Both models are remarkable; the right choice will depend on what prospective buyers value most in their SUV experience.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Honda CR-V is moderately cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,420 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 82 km, about 4 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 271 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers substantially more torque with 709 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 374 Nm more.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is only slightly lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 79 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers clearly more boot space – 617 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 134 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries somewhat more – 550 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details
Volvo XC60
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
BMW iX3
Volvo XC60
VS
The BMW iX3 and Volvo XC60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Lexus NX stand out for their unique strengths. While the CR-V impresses with its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, the Lexus NX offers a more luxurious feel and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these …
Volvo XC60
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Electric Range
78 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 169 g/km
co2
59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
4,708 mm
Length
-
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Height
1,655 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 - 550 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Honda
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.