VS

Volvo XC60 vs Lynk & Co 02 comparison

Compare performance (455 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (49,200 £ vs 30,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Lynk & Co 02?

Volvo XC60 vs Lynk & Co 02: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space

Lynk & Co 02

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • marginally lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Lynk & Co 02 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,900 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,339 £.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 02 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 445 km, about 363 km more than the Volvo XC60.

02

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 183 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Lynk & Co 02 takes 5.5 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers significantly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 323 Nm. That’s about 386 Nm more.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Lynk & Co 02 is marginally lighter – 1,895 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 5 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers a bit more boot space – 483 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 offers moderately more capacity – up to 1,543 L, about 194 L more than the Lynk & Co 02.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries markedly more – 550 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 02 shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,900
02

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 435 - 445 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Lynk & Co 02

The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.

details
serpimg_8xULuL

Reviews Lynk & Co 02

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
ZEEKR X
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The ZEEKR X and Lynk & Co 02 present a compelling comparison in the electric SUV segment, each appealing to distinct consumer preferences. While the ZEEKR X boasts a sleek design and cutting-edge technology, the Lynk & Co 02 emphasizes versatility with its unique subscription model and …
BMW iX3
Volvo XC60
VS
The BMW iX3 and Volvo XC60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 02

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 169 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,895 kg
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
4,708 mm
Length
4,460 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,845 mm
Height
1,655 mm
Height
1,573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Max trunk capacity
1,349 L
Payload
510 - 550 kg
Payload
375 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Torque
323 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Lynk & Co
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.