Compare performance (455 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (49,200 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Mazda CX-60?
The automotive market has been rapidly evolving, with manufacturers continuously pushing the envelope in terms of technology, design, and performance. Today, we will explore a compelling comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60. Both SUVs stand out in their respective segments, but which one offers more value for money? Let’s dive into the details.
Starting with the aesthetics, both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 boast modern and elegant designs. The CX-60 measures 4745 mm in length, 1890 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height, providing a robust presence on the road. The XC60, meanwhile, is slightly shorter at 4688 mm, with a width of 1902 mm and a height of 1658 mm. While the CX-60 offers a more muscular look, the Volvo presents a sleek and sophisticated profile that is unmistakably Scandinavian.
Under the hood, the Mazda CX-60 provides a range of engine options, including a 2.5-liter plugin hybrid generating up to 327 HP and a diesel MHEV option with 200 HP. With acceleration times ranging from 5.8 seconds for the hybrid to 8.4 seconds for the diesel variant, the CX-60 prioritizes both performance and efficiency. Offering an all-wheel or rear-wheel-drive system, it caters to diverse driving preferences.
In stark contrast, the Volvo XC60 showcases a formidable lineup, highlighted by a plugin hybrid variant with a maximum output of 455 HP. Its range of engines also includes petrol MHEV options that deliver robust performance, with the fastest variant achieving 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds. While the XC60 is known for its spirited performance, it sacrifices some fuel efficiency compared to its Mazda counterpart, especially with a consumption figure that goes up to 7.7 L/100km.
When it comes to technological advancements, both models shine in different ways. The Mazda CX-60 introduces an intuitive infotainment system seamlessly integrated into its elegant cabin. With a focus on driver engagement, features such as a head-up display, adaptive cruise control, and comprehensive safety systems like Mazda’s i-Activsense are part of the offering.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 prides itself on an extensive array of safety features, backed by Volvo’s renowned commitment to occupant protection. Its Sensus Connect system provides a user-friendly interface while delivering cutting-edge connectivity. Notably, the XC60 also offers pilot assist technology, enhancing both safety and the driving experience.
Inside the CX-60, you are met with premium materials and a spacious ambience, with a trunk capacity of 570 liters, ideal for families and long trips. The vehicle seats five comfortably, with excellent legroom and headroom throughout.
The XC60, while slightly less capacious with a trunk capacity of 483 liters, provides an equally luxurious interior setting. Known for its ergonomic design and high-quality finishes, it excels in offering both comfort and practicality, making it a great choice for those who prioritize a sophisticated travel experience.
Efficiency is a crucial factor in today’s automotive landscape. The Mazda CX-60 hybrid variant boasts an impressive electric range of 64 km, with CO2 emissions as low as 31 g/km, aligning with modern environmental standards. Its hybrid technology showcases Mazda’s commitment to sustainability without compromising on performance.
Conversely, the Volvo XC60 leads in electric range with its hybrid version reaching up to 80 km, and CO2 emissions as low as 22 g/km in selected configurations. With a 14.7 kWh battery capacity for its hybrids, Volvo emphasizes both efficiency and the use of innovative technologies in their offerings.
Choosing between the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. The CX-60 shines with its performance and innovative features at a more attractive price point, making it an outstanding value proposition. In contrast, the XC60 excels in luxury, safety, and cutting-edge technology, catering to those who seek a premium SUV experience.
Whichever SUV you choose, both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC60 present exceptional options that combine innovation, safety, and performance in the ever-competitive automotive market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-60 is a bit cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,520 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 82 km, about 19 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers visibly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is very slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 10 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers moderately more boot space – 570 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 87 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries moderately more – 612 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.
The Volvo XC60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4,708 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
1,655 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España