Compare performance (406 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (58,300 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Skoda Karoq?
In the competitive world of SUVs, the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC60 are two contenders that cater to drivers who value a mix of practicality, power, and innovation. These two vehicles, both from the 2024 model year, provide a compelling choice for different segments of the market. Here, we delve into a detailed comparison to see which might suit your driving needs better.
The Skoda Karoq offers a range of engine options including both petrol and diesel variants. With power outputs ranging from 115 to 190 HP, the Karoq caters to a wide array of driving preferences. The Karoq features both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, and offers options for both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. Its efficient fuel consumption, approximately between 4.9 and 7.6 L/100km, makes it a practical choice for daily commutes and longer journeys alike. Acceleration times vary, with the quickest model achieving 0-100 km/h in 7 seconds.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 ups the ante with its hybrid engine options, including a petrol mild hybrid and a plug-in hybrid. With power outputs of 250 HP, 398 HP, and up to 455 HP, the XC60 is a powerhouse designed for performance enthusiasts. It uses an automatic transmission to complement its all-wheel drive, delivering a seamless driving experience. The plug-in hybrid model impresses with a combined fuel consumption as low as 0.9 L/100km and an electric range of up to 80 km, making it an environmentally conscious option with an 0-100 km/h acceleration time of just 4.9 seconds.
Both SUVs offer ample seating for five passengers. The Skoda Karoq focuses on practicality, featuring a trunk capacity of 521 liters, which is larger than the XC60's 483 or 468 liters, depending on the configuration. Despite being the smaller SUV with a length of 4390 mm and width of 1841 mm, the Karoq is designed to maximize usable space.
The Volvo XC60, while slightly larger at 4688 mm in length and 1902 mm in width, is geared towards luxury and comfort. It boasts a more lavish interior, equipped with premium materials and advanced technology, making it an appealing option for those prioritizing a high-end driving experience.
When it comes to driving dynamics, the Karoq is more about versatility and fuel efficiency. It offers a comfortable ride with responsive handling, ideal for city driving and weekend getaways. Its all-wheel-drive option provides added stability, particularly useful in challenging road conditions.
The Volvo XC60, however, stands out with its innovative approach. Advanced driver assistance systems, along with a suite of safety features, ensure a secure and high-tech driving environment. Its all-wheel-drive system, combined with optional air suspension, provides a smoother ride and optimal handling across various terrains.
In conclusion, both the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC60 offer compelling features that cater to different needs. While the Karoq is a solid choice for those seeking value, efficiency, and practicality in an SUV, the XC60 appeals to drivers looking for luxury, power, and cutting-edge technology. The decision ultimately comes down to what you prioritize in a vehicle: the affordable versatility of the Karoq or the luxurious innovation of the XC60. Choose the one that best fits your lifestyle and driving desires.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Karoq is substantially cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,195 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 216 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Karoq takes 7 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers significantly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Karoq is significantly lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 770 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Karoq carries barely more – 549 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
The Volvo XC60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
|
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
59 g/km
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,150 kg
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
Width
1,841 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
510 kg
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España