VS

Volvo XC90 vs MG Cyberster comparison

Compare performance (406 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (74,300 £ vs 55,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC90 or MG Cyberster?

Volvo XC90 vs MG Cyberster: Key differences

Volvo XC90

5 (3 Reviews)
rate
details

MG Cyberster

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC90

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG Cyberster is visibly cheaper – starting at 55,700 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,600 £.

As for electric range, the MG Cyberster offers significantly more range – reaching up to 507 km, about 438 km more than the Volvo XC90.

Cyberster

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers markedly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 406 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Volvo XC90 takes 5.4 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers only slightly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 56 Nm more.

XC90

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, MG Cyberster is very slightly lighter – 1,960 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 120 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries substantially more – 710 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 560 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Cyberster holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,700
Cyberster

MG Cyberster

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 510 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 443 - 507 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC90
MG MGS9
VS
The Volvo XC90 and the MG MGS9 are rival seven-seat SUVs aimed at buyers who want space, comfort and modern tech — but they come from very different traditions: Volvo leans on safety, refined materials and a premium driving feel, while MG focuses on affordability and generous equipment. This quick …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Volvo XC90
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC90

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

details
294665_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294657_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294651_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
248324_XC90_Plug-In_Hybrid_Inscription_T8_-_Seat_Configuration
294870_XC90_Recharge_interior

Reviews Volvo XC90

5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Heiko
2 Aug 2026, 12:58:10

I won a Dacia Duster in a lottery. Sold it after six months. Just cheap junk. Then the XC90/1 and now the XC90/2. There are galaxies between them. A Volvo is a Volvo when it comes to reliability, durability and luxury.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ffg
16 May 2026, 03:34:35

Ffggggggg ffg

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Borstel
11 Nov 2025, 12:59:12

I drive both cars. The XC90’s boot is — contrary to the figures posted here — noticeably larger than the GLC’s when carrying five people. Overall the XC90 is clearly the more comfortable and, above all, the more stable — and therefore the safer — car.

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes GLE
Volvo XC90
VS
In the competitive luxury SUV segment, the Mercedes GLE and Volvo XC90 stand out for their distinctive qualities. The GLE impresses with its dynamic performance and cutting-edge technology, offering an engaging driving experience, while the XC90 enchants with its Scandinavian design and commitment …
Volvo V90
Volvo XC90
VS
In comparing the Volvo V90 and the Volvo XC90, buyers will find distinct advantages tailored to different lifestyle needs. The V90, with its sleek wagon design and sophisticated handling, appeals to those who value a more traditional driving experience combined with generous cargo space. On the …
MG Cyberster
Denza Z9GT
VS
MG Cyberster and Denza Z9GT go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the MG Cyberster or the Denza …
Peugeot 5008
Volvo XC90
VS
The Peugeot 5008 and Volvo XC90 both offer three-row seating but aim at different buyers: the 5008 is a practical, value-focused family SUV while the XC90 is a premium, safety-led luxury SUV. This comparison will focus on space, comfort, performance, efficiency and running costs to help you decide …
Volvo XC90
VW Caddy
VS
Volvo XC90 and VW Caddy go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Volvo XC90 or the VW Caddy is …
Volvo XC90
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC90 is the serene, safety-obsessed family flagship—roomy, plush and blessed with Volvo’s calm Scandinavian style and efficient hybrid options that make long hauls a pleasure. The VW Tayron, by contrast, is the scrappy value player: sharper to drive, loaded with slick tech for less money, …
BMW X7
Volvo XC90
VS
BMW X7 and Volvo XC90 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BMW X7 or the Volvo XC90 is the …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC90
VS
In the battle of the SUVs, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its reliability and practicality, making it a top choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC90 impresses with its luxurious interior and advanced safety features, catering to those who prioritize comfort and …
Volvo XC90
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
69 km
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
71 - 188 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
7
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
200 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,923 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
600 - 710 kg
Payload
150 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
MG
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC90?

The Volvo XC90 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.