Compare performance (150 HP vs 325 HP), boot space and price (25,800 £ vs 37,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW Caddy Compact Van or Peugeot 5008?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling world of family-friendly vehicles, the Peugeot 5008 and VW Caddy Kompaktvan stand out as two distinct contenders. They cater to different niches but share a common goal: offering practicality, comfort, and innovative engineering. Let's explore how these two vehicles stack up against each other in terms of technical prowess and modern features.
The Peugeot 5008 prides itself on its SUV heritage, boasting a sleek design and generous dimensions of 4791 mm in length, 1895 mm in width, and 1694 mm in height. This makes it a stylish yet spacious option for families. With seven seats and five doors, it's crafted for those who need flexibility on the road.
Contrastingly, the VW Caddy Kompaktvan leans towards the utilitarian side with its cargo van design. Available in lengths of 4500 mm or 4853 mm, and a consistent width of 1855 mm, it offers a higher vertical space of up to 1823 mm, making it a versatile choice for business and leisure. The Caddy comes with options for four or five doors and primarily seats two, focusing on maximizing cargo capacity.
The Peugeot 5008 offers a diverse range of engines including petrol, mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV), plugin hybrid, and electric variants. Power outputs range from 136 HP to 231 HP, ensuring a balance between performance and efficiency. Its clever use of a dual-clutch automatic transmission contributes to a smooth ride. Remarkably, the electric version can achieve an impressive range of up to 664 km on a single charge.
In contrast, the VW Caddy Kompaktvan provides a traditional selection of petrol, diesel, and plugin hybrid engines. With power outputs from 102 HP to 150 HP, it may not match the 5008 on power, but it compensates with practicality. The Caddy also offers both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, alongside the flexibility of front-wheel and all-wheel drive options. For eco-conscious buyers, the plugin hybrid variant offers a modest electric range of around 120 km.
Peugeot has equipped the 5008 with an array of modern features. Its dual-clutch automatic transmission and advanced driver-assist systems enhance driving pleasure and safety. Additionally, the 5008’s electric models benefit from a significant battery capacity of up to 96.9 kWh, ensuring long journeys are tackleable without frequent recharges.
Meanwhile, the VW Caddy is tailored with practicality in mind, featuring engine capacities of 1498 cm3 to 1968 cm3. Its robust build is ideal for those who need a dependable partner for both work and play. The efficiency of its engines and drive type options cater well to eco-conscious consumers, despite less emphasis on pure electric performance compared to the 5008.
In conclusion, selecting between the Peugeot 5008 and the VW Caddy Kompaktvan largely depends on individual needs and lifestyle. The Peugeot 5008 is an ideal choice for families seeking a blend of style, comfort, and cutting-edge hybrid and electric technology, complete with comprehensive seating capacity. In contrast, the VW Caddy Kompaktvan is perfect for business or leisure activities requiring ample cargo space and the versatility of a van setup.
SUV luxury meets cargo van versatility in this head-to-head—whether your priority is space or style, fuel efficiency or power, both vehicles stand ready to serve, each dominant in their unique realms.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW Caddy Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,800 £ , while the Peugeot 5008 costs 37,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,773 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Caddy Compact Van uses 0.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Peugeot 5008 with 2.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 5008 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 669 km, about 549 km more than the VW Caddy Compact Van.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 5008 offers clearly more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 175 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Peugeot 5008 is barely faster – reaching 198 km/h, while the VW Caddy Compact Van tops out at 186 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 5008 delivers visibly more torque with 511 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 191 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Peugeot 5008 offers more seats – 7 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is slightly lighter – 1,442 kg compared to 1,700 kg. The difference is around 258 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the VW Caddy Compact Van offers clearly more capacity – up to 3,700 L, about 1,468 L more than the Peugeot 5008.
When it comes to payload, the VW Caddy Compact Van carries slightly more – 759 kg compared to 640 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.
The VW Caddy Compact Van stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
The Peugeot 5008 blends Peugeot's sharp design with the space and versatility families actually need, wrapping clever packaging and a premium-feeling cabin in a crisp, SUV-like silhouette. It drives with more poise than you'd expect from a people carrier, serves up practical touches and flexible seating for everyday chaos, and still looks good when parked outside the school gates.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,800 - 42,300 £
|
Price
37,600 - 54,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
|
Electric Range
78 - 669 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 96.9 kWh
|
|
co2
11 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 - 127 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,442 - 1,818 kg
|
Curb weight
1,700 - 2,344 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
294 - 348 L
|
|
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
|
Length
4,791 mm
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,895 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,823 mm
|
Height
1,694 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 3,700 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,178 - 2,232 L
|
|
Payload
628 - 759 kg
|
Payload
596 - 640 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 198 km/h
|
|
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España