VS

VW T-Cross vs Mitsubishi Outlander comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Cross or Mitsubishi Outlander?

VW T-Cross vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Key differences

VW T-Cross

4 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW T-Cross is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,454 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Outlander uses 2.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.

Outlander

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers clearly more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 156 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Outlander is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

T-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is clearly lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 2,156 kg. The difference is around 889 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers barely more boot space – 498 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Outlander carries marginally more – 529 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Outlander holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
Outlander

Mitsubishi Outlander

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 83 - 85 km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and the VW T-Cross are closely matched compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a touch of SUV style. This comparison focuses on space, fuel economy, driving feel, safety and running costs to help you decide which suits your …
VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Meet the VW T‑Cross and VW Taigo: two compact crossovers from Volkswagen chasing the same urban buyers but with very different personalities — the practical, upright T‑Cross versus the swoopy, style-first Taigo. Read on to see which one earns a place in your driveway, whether you prize family …
VW T-Cross
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4 (5 Reviews)
rate
Arturo
27 May 2026, 04:19:26

In terms of interior space and driving, the T‑Cross is far superior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Mitsubishi Outlander

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details
VIC01568-HDR-Edit-Edit-2
25_Outlander_DSC05046
25_Outlander_DSC05200

Reviews Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
Vinces
3 Jun 2026, 11:34:17

It's better to choose the modes yourself (electric/internal-combustion) than to let the car decide.
Plenty of storage, but small.
Good handling, reasonable fuel consumption off the highway, but penalizing on the highway.
Lots of annoying "driver-assistance" features, fortunately deactivatable, but you have to do it at every start.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mónica Tobón
8 May 2026, 17:25:26

Me gusta un carro más potente y la marca de fabricación Japonesa me gusta mucho

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mark Joe
4 May 2026, 06:33:44

Best Outlander

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris Cross and the VW T‑Cross means deciding whether you want Toyota’s hybrid efficiency and nimble city manners or Volkswagen’s more conventional, spacious small SUV package. The Yaris Cross focuses on low running costs and urban agility, while the T‑Cross delivers a …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Mitsubishi Outlander
MG MG4 Urban
VS
Choosing between the Mitsubishi Outlander and the MG4 Urban comes down to whether you want a spacious, versatile SUV with hybrid options and towing capability or a compact, efficient electric hatch for city-focused driving. This comparison will show how the Outlander’s practicality and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can …
VW Golf
VW T-Cross
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Cross comes down to whether you want a traditional hatchback with sharper driving dynamics or a compact crossover that prioritizes space, practicality and a higher seating position. The Golf rewards with more engaging handling and a refined interior, while …
Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Cross
VS
Comparing the Skoda Karoq and the VW T-Cross sets a roomy, family-focused compact SUV against a smaller, city-friendly crossover. The Karoq emphasizes interior space, practicality and comfort on longer trips, while the T-Cross is easier to park, typically cheaper to buy and better suited to urban …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Cross
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and the VW T-Cross are two popular small SUVs that suit different needs: the Qashqai prioritises space, comfort and refinement, while the T-Cross offers compact practicality and strong value for city life. This comparison will help you decide whether you need the roomier, more …
VW T-Cross
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
124 - 136 g/km
co2
60 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
Trunk capacity
455 L
Trunk capacity
498 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,784 mm
Width
1,862 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
463 - 480 kg
Payload
453 - 529 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
VW
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drivetrain options does the VW T-Cross have?

The VW T-Cross is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.