VS

VW T-Cross vs Nissan Micra – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: VW T-Cross meets Nissan Micra.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW T-Cross has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £, while the Nissan Micra costs 24000 £. That’s a price difference of around 2914 £.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

Both models deliver identical power – 150 HP each.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Micra is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Cross performs noticeable better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Nissan Micra tops out at 150 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Cross pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 250 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is a bit lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1452 kg. The difference is around 185 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Cross offers clearly perceptible more room – 455 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Cross performs a bit better – up to 1281 L, which is about 175 L more than the Nissan Micra.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Cross slightly takes the win – 480 kg compared to 408 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW T-Cross shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £21,100
DB2021AU01108_medium

VW T-Cross

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 6 L
details

VW T-Cross

4 (1)
rate

The VW T-Cross stands out as a versatile compact SUV that combines practicality with style. Its interior design offers a spacious and flexible layout, ideal for both city driving and weekend adventures. With its modern infotainment system, the T-Cross ensures drivers and passengers stay connected throughout their journeys.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01109_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01111_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01114_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01120_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01124_medium @ Volkswagen

Nissan Micra

The Nissan Micra is a compact hatchback renowned for its agile handling and city-friendly dimensions. With a design that blends sleek curves with a practical layout, it appeals to urban drivers who value style and efficiency. Inside, the car offers a surprising amount of room and useful tech features, making it both a convenient and comfortable ride for daily commutes.

details

Similar Comparisons

Citroen C3 Aircross
VW T-Cross
VS
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
VW T-Cross
Nissan Micra
T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
21100 - 31500 £
Price
24000 - 29900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.2 - 14.7 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
317 - 416 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
40 - 52 kWh
co2
124 - 136 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Curb weight
1452 - 1527 kg
Trunk capacity
455 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
4127 mm
Length
3974 mm
Width
1784 mm
Width
1774 mm
Height
1573 mm
Height
1490 mm
Max trunk capacity
1281 L
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Payload
463 - 480 kg
Payload
403 - 408 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
150 km/h
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
VW
Brand
Nissan

Similar Comparisons

Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities, catering to varying consumer preferences. The Q2 boasts a more premium feel with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the T-Cross provides practicality with its spacious cabin and impressive cargo capacity. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on whether buyers prioritize luxury or versatility in their everyday driving experiences.
Vauxhall Mokka
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Opel Mokka and VW T-Cross stand out with their distinct styles and features. The Mokka impresses with its bold design and cutting-edge technology, while the T-Cross offers a more practical interior and a comfortable driving experience. Ultimately, choosing between the two will depend on whether you prioritize flair or functionality in your urban driving adventures.
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities while sharing a similar platform. The Arona embodies a sporty spirit with its dynamic styling and vibrant color options, appealing to a younger audience, while the T-Cross emphasizes practicality and a more conservative design that caters to family-oriented buyers. Both models deliver a well-rounded driving experience, but their unique features and branding make them stand out in their own right.
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitively growing subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota Yaris Cross and VW T-Cross stand out for their distinct offerings. The Yaris Cross boasts impressive hybrid efficiency and a rugged design, catering to environmentally conscious buyers seeking adventure. Meanwhile, the T-Cross excels in interior space and advanced technology, appealing to urban drivers looking for practicality without sacrificing style.
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the VW Polo and the VW T-Cross cater to different driving needs while maintaining Volkswagen's signature quality. The Polo, a beloved supermini, offers a sleek and nimble ride ideal for urban environments, boasting efficiency and precision handling. On the other hand, the T-Cross presents a more robust option with its SUV-inspired design, offering increased space and versatility perfect for active families seeking a practical yet stylish vehicle.
VW T-Cross
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the SEAT Ateca stands out with its sportier design and slightly more powerful engine options compared to the Volkswagen T-Cross. While the T-Cross offers a comfortable ride with an emphasis on practicality and interior space, the Ateca leans towards a more dynamic driving experience without sacrificing everyday usability. Both models boast impressive technology and safety features, making them appealing choices for urban drivers and families alike.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and VW T-Cross stand out with their distinctive styles and practicality. While both models share the same platform, the Kamiq offers a slightly more spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families. On the other hand, the T-Cross prides itself on its extensive technology features and refined driving dynamics, appealing to those seeking a more premium feel in the compact SUV market.
What drive types are available for the VW T-Cross?

The VW T-Cross is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.