Compare performance (150 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (19,900 £ vs 23,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW Taigo or Vauxhall Mokka?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling world of compact SUVs, two contenders stand out in the 2024 model year: the Vauxhall Mokka and the VW Taigo. Both representing the pinnacle of European automotive engineering, they offer unique features and innovation. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set these two compact SUVs apart.
The Vauxhall Mokka is versatile in its engine offerings, including petrol, mild-hybrid (MHEV), and fully electric variants, which cater to a diverse range of drivers' preferences and environmental considerations. The power output ranges from 130 HP in the petrol model to 156 HP in the electric variant, with torque peaking at 260 Nm. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies between 9 to 9.2 seconds, with a max speed capping at 207 km/h, all while maintaining a competitive CO2 efficiency.
On the other hand, the VW Taigo is solely petrol-powered, with engine options producing between 95 and 150 HP. Its fastest variant accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 8.2 seconds with a top speed of 212 km/h, slightly outperforming the Mokka in speed but restricted to less environmentally friendly options, given its CO2 efficiency class remains at D.
The Mokka offers a blend of transmission options, including manual, dual-clutch automatic, and a reduction gearbox for the electric model, ensuring smooth transitions and adaptability to driver preference. Coupled with its front-wheel-drive, the Mokka promises spirited drive dynamics across its variants.
Similarly, the VW Taigo provides both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, enhancing driving ease in varied conditions. Its focus remains on simplicity and traditional combustion, potentially appealing to drivers less drawn to electrification.
In terms of size, the Mokka measures 4,150 mm in length, 1,787 mm in width, and 1,535 mm in height. Despite its compact size, it offers a trunk capacity of up to 350 L, making it practical for urban settings and light travel.
Meanwhile, the Taigo stretches slightly longer at 4,266 mm, with a width of 1,757 mm and a height of 1,518 mm. Its more generous trunk capacity of 440 L gives it an edge in carrying capacity, suitable for families or drivers who prioritize cargo space.
Fuel efficiency is a crucial consideration, and both models deliver impressive numbers. The Mokka's petrol and hybrid variants consume between 4.8 to 6.2 L/100km when fueled traditionally, with its electric model consuming 15.4 kWh/100km and boasting a range of over 400 km.
The Taigo's petrol engines show similar efficiency, consuming between 5.4 and 5.8 L/100km. However, the absence of an electric variant might deter eco-conscious consumers seeking zero-emission commutes.
Both the Vauxhall Mokka and VW Taigo bring forward their best for 2024, each car catering to a specific audience. The Mokka shines with its wide engine variety and electric innovations, while the Taigo appeals to those leaning towards traditional combustion efficiency and larger practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these compact SUVs will depend on individual preferences regarding powertrain, driving experience, and lifestyle needs.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW Taigo is a bit cheaper – starting at 19,900 £ , while the Vauxhall Mokka costs 23,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,128 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Mokka uses 4.9 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the VW Taigo with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Mokka offers substantially more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Mokka is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the VW Taigo takes 8.2 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Mokka delivers markedly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW Taigo is barely lighter – 1,229 kg compared to 1,294 kg. The difference is around 65 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW Taigo offers visibly more boot space – 440 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW Taigo carries moderately more – 457 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.
The Vauxhall Mokka stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW Taigo brings coupe-like flair to the compact crossover scene with sharp styling and an interior that punches above its price, feeling smarter than you’d expect. It’s an easygoing daily companion that balances comfort and practicality with a playful wink, perfect for city drivers who want something livelier than a regular hatchback.
details
The Opel Mokka cuts a smart, modern silhouette that feels right at home in the city while still turning heads on the open road. It's a practical, easy-to-live-with crossover that blends comfy driving manners with enough flair and tech to keep daily commutes interesting — and it won’t make you regret trading up.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
19,900 - 31,800 £
|
Price
23,000 - 40,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
336 - 403 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
120 - 132 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,229 - 1,302 kg
|
Curb weight
1,294 - 1,672 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 350 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,150 mm
|
|
Width
1,757 mm
|
Width
1,787 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,515 - 1,535 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,060 - 1,105 L
|
|
Payload
448 - 457 kg
|
Payload
388 - 400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 281 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 11.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 - 209 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España