VS

XPeng P7 vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (473 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (42,500 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – XPeng P7 or Mazda CX-6e?

XPeng P7 vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

XPeng P7

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • considerably more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter

Mazda CX-6e

  • very slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

P7

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

XPeng P7 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 42,500 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 334 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the XPeng P7 is moderately more efficient: consuming 16.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the XPeng P7 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 92 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng P7 offers considerably more power – delivering 473 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 215 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng P7 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng P7 delivers considerably more torque with 757 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 467 Nm more.

P7

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, XPeng P7 is barely lighter – 2,020 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 185 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-6e offers very slightly more boot space – 468 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

When it comes to payload, the XPeng P7 carries a bit more – 430 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng P7 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,500
P7

XPeng P7

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 276 - 473 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.8 - 19.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 505 - 576 km
XPeng P7
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

XPeng P7

The XPeng P7 cuts a sleek, coupe-like silhouette that looks like a tech firm's idea of a stylish electric sedan, and its minimalist cabin packs smart screens and handy features that actually improve everyday life. Underneath the future-facing image it drives with surprising poise and comes loaded with advanced driver aids, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want electric charisma without the hype.

details

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
XPeng P7
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

Price
42,500 - 50,200 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 19.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
505 - 576 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
82.7 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,020 - 2,140 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
4,888 mm
Length
-
Width
1,896 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
1,450 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
276 - 473 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
440 - 757 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
203 - 348 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
XPeng
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.