Alpine A390 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Alpine A390, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Alpine A390

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Alpine A390 and are good next research steps.

from £49,900
i4

BMW i4

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 286 - 601 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.7 - 16.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 514 - 613 km

BMW i4 as a suitable alternative to Alpine A390

The BMW i4 and the Alpine A390 are two very different propositions: the i4 delivers electric-powered refinement and everyday usability, while the Alpine A390 focuses on lightweight, driver-focused sportiness. This comparison will cut through the noise so you can quickly see which car better matches your priorities—comfort and tech, or pure driving engagement.

The BMW i4 arrives with the poise of a classic Gran Coupé, marrying BMW's playful handling with a sleek, modern interior that makes switching to electric feel like an upgrade rather than a compromise. For buyers who want a practical daily driver that still enjoys a spirited back-road run, the i4 quietly delivers smiles and a surprising dose of driver engagement.

Quick data check: BMW i4

  • slightly more trunk space
  • somewhat cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
from £53,100
4

Polestar 4

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 - 544 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 590 - 620 km

Polestar 4 as a suitable alternative to Alpine A390

The Polestar 4 and Alpine A390 represent two very different takes on performance and style: the Polestar 4 is a polished, tech-rich electric crossover focused on everyday comfort and efficiency, while the Alpine A390 prioritizes a lightweight, driver-focused sports-car experience. Choosing between them comes down to whether you want refined EV practicality and advanced tech, or a sharper, more visceral driving connection.

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

Quick data check: Polestar 4

  • very slightly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
  • barely cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
from £37,700
Rafale

Renault Rafale

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2 - 5 L/100km
  • Electric Range 97 km

Renault Rafale as a suitable alternative to Alpine A390

The Renault Rafale and the Alpine A390 pit two different approaches to sporty French motoring against each other: the Rafale leans toward a sleek, tech-rich grand-tourer crossover, while the A390 is aimed at lightweight, driver-focused performance in traditional Alpine fashion. This comparison will help you decide whether you prefer the Rafale’s comfort and everyday usability or the A390’s sharper handling and more visceral driving character.

The Renault Rafale dresses bold coupé-inspired lines around a practical crossover body, turning heads without trying too hard. Inside it serves up a comfortable, well-equipped cabin and engaging driving manners, making it a clever choice for buyers who want a bit of panache with their daily commute.

Quick data check: Renault Rafale

  • clearly more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
from £34,300
Model Y

Tesla Model Y

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 299 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.1 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 534 - 622 km

Quick data check: Tesla Model Y

  • very slightly more power
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
from £39,600
CLA Coupe

Mercedes CLA Coupe

  • Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 156 - 354 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 12.3 - 12.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 542 - 792 km

Quick data check: Mercedes CLA Coupe

  • markedly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km

Quick data check: Audi Q4 e-tron

  • noticeably more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • only slightly lighter
  • barely more trunk space
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.