Lynk & Co 02 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Lynk & Co 02, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Lynk & Co 02

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Lynk & Co 02 and are good next research steps.

from £32,600
X

ZEEKR X

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 - 496 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.4 - 18.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 330 - 415 km
details

ZEEKR X as a suitable alternative to Lynk & Co 02

We’re squaring off the ZEEKR X against the Lynk & Co 02 to find which compact crossover delivers the best blend of design, tech and real-world usability. Expect sparks in the handling department from the ZEEKR and everyday cleverness from the 02 — the question is which one fits your driveway and your wallet.

The Zeekr X feels like a pocket rocket for city life, delivering brisk performance and nimble handling wrapped in a surprisingly premium little package. Inside it offers smart tech and refined materials that make daily driving feel more like a small luxury escape, all while keeping a tasteful, understated presence.

Quick data check: ZEEKR X

  • marginally cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • barely more trunk space
  • significantly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
Compare directly with ZEEKR X
from £31,700
Model 3

Tesla Model 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 283 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 534 - 750 km
details

Tesla Model 3 as a suitable alternative to Lynk & Co 02

The Tesla Model 3 and the Lynk & Co 02 are very different cars: the Model 3 is a minimalist, electric sedan built around efficiency and software-driven features, while the 02 is a compact, connectivity-focused crossover aimed at practicality and value. This comparison zeroes in on driving dynamics, ownership costs, interior usability and tech so you can pick the one that fits your needs.

The Tesla Model 3 is a compact electric sedan that pairs brisk, responsive driving with a sleek, minimalist cabin and intuitive, software-led features. It makes a practical, modern choice for daily commutes and long-term ownership while emphasizing simplicity and advanced driver assistance.

Quick data check: Tesla Model 3

  • barely cheaper
  • substantially more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
Compare directly with Tesla Model 3
from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km
details

Toyota C-HR+ as a suitable alternative to Lynk & Co 02

The Lynk & Co 02 and the Toyota C‑HR go head-to-head as compact crossovers that blend urban-friendly dimensions with bold styling. I'll compare the 02 and the Toyota C‑HR across design, driving feel, practicality and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

Quick data check: Toyota C-HR+

  • somewhat cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
Compare directly with Toyota C-HR+
from £36,900
01

Lynk & Co 01

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 75 km
details

Quick data check: Lynk & Co 01

  • moderately cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • only slightly more power
  • a bit more trunk space
Compare directly with Lynk & Co 01
from £36,800
MG4

MG MG4

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 435 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.1 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 405 - 545 km
details

Quick data check: MG MG4

  • a bit cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
Compare directly with MG MG4
from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
details

Quick data check: Hyundai Kona

  • noticeably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • noticeably lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
Compare directly with Hyundai Kona

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Lynk & Co 02 head-to-head against similar models.

ZEEKR X
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Tesla Model 3
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Lynk & Co 02
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 02
VS
MG MG4
Lynk & Co 02
VS
Hyundai Kona
Lynk & Co 02
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.