Mazda CX-5 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-5, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mazda CX-5

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-5 and are good next research steps.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km

Mazda CX-60 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while the CX-60 targets those who want extra refinement, performance and advanced tech.

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-60

  • clearly cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
from £41,900
XC40

Volvo XC40

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.5 L/100km

Volvo XC40 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes safety, clever interior packaging and a modern, minimalist design—so your choice depends on whether you value driver enjoyment or city-friendly versatility and tech-forward safety.

The Volvo XC40 blends Scandinavian design with practical versatility, offering a compact luxury crossover that feels composed and easy to live with. It’s refined and focused on safety with a high-quality interior, making it a smart choice for daily city driving and weekend escapes.

Quick data check: Volvo XC40

  • visibly cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
  • visibly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
from £42,800
CX-6e

Mazda CX-6e

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 468 - 484 km

Mazda CX-6e as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on the driveway.

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-6e

  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • considerably more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 68 km

Ford Kuga as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a slightly sharper driving feel.

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

Quick data check: Ford Kuga

  • moderately cheaper
  • considerably more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
from £29,100
Sportage

Kia Sportage

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 - 288 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.9 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 - 66 km

Kia Sportage as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

In the competitive compact SUV market, the Kia Sportage and Mazda CX-5 stand out with their distinct design philosophies and driving dynamics. While the Sportage offers a spacious interior and an array of advanced tech features, the CX-5 is celebrated for its engaging handling and upscale cabin quality. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to personal preference regarding style and driving experience.

The Kia Sportage is a roomy, well-equipped compact SUV that balances comfort and practicality for daily driving. It delivers a modern interior, composed ride, and strong value for buyers who want versatility without fuss.

Quick data check: Kia Sportage

  • marginally cheaper
  • significantly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
from £56,400
F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 575 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.8 - 12 L/100km
  • Electric Range 64 km

Jaguar F-Pace as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

Comparing the Jaguar F‑Pace and the Mazda CX‑5 pits a sporty, luxury-oriented midsize SUV against a sharply styled, value-focused compact crossover — a matchup of premium feel and driving dynamics versus everyday practicality and efficiency. Choose the F‑Pace if you prioritize performance, brand cachet and upscale materials; pick the CX‑5 if you want excellent build quality, lower running costs and stronger value for money.

Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.

Quick data check: Jaguar F-Pace

  • substantially cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.