Mazda CX-5 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-5, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-5 and are good next research steps.

from £43,700

Mazda CX-60

Price 43,700 - 57,900 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 200 - 327 HP
Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Electric Range 63 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.8 - 8.4 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Model CX-60
Modell CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv PHEV, CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D 200, CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D 254
CO2 Efficiency Class B, D, E
Trim Level Prime-Line AWD Automatik, Exclusive-Line AWD Automatik, Prime-Line Automatik, Exclusive-Line Automatik, Homura AWD Automatik, Takumi AWD Automatik, Homura Plus AWD Automatik, Takumi Plus AWD Automatik, Homura Automatik, Takumi Automatik
Power kW 147 - 241 kW
co2 85 - 137 g/km
Engine capacity 2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Curb weight 1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity 570 L
Width 1,890 mm
Brand Mazda
Payload 581 - 612 kg

details

Mazda CX-60 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while the CX-60 targets those who want extra refinement, performance and advanced tech.

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-60

clearly cheaper
somewhat lighter
clearly more power
clearly more efficient
clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
a bit more trunk space

Compare directly with Mazda CX-60

from £42,800

Mazda CX-6e

Price 42,800 - 45,400 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 258 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range 468 - 484 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.9 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 290 Nm
Model CX-6e
Modell CX-6e
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Takumi, Takumi Plus
Power kW 190 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,205 kg
Trunk capacity 468 L
Width 1,935 mm
Brand Mazda
Payload 385 kg

details

Mazda CX-6e as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on the driveway.

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-6e

significantly cheaper
clearly lighter
considerably more power
noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
only slightly more trunk space

Compare directly with Mazda CX-6e

from £40,200

VW Tayron

Price 40,200 - 56,000 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 272 HP
Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
Electric Range 116 - 123 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.1 - 9.7 s
Model Year 2,025 - 2,026
Torque 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Tayron
Modell Tayron 1.5 eTSI, Tayron 2.0 TDI SCR, Tayron 2.0 TSI OPF, Tayron 1.5 eHybrid OPF
CO2 Efficiency Class E, F, B, G
Trim Level Life DSG, Life 4MOTION DSG, R-Line 4MOTION DSG, Elegance DSG, Elegance 4MOTION DSG, R-Line DSG, R-Line 195 4MOTION DSG
Power kW 110 - 200 kW
co2 33 - 192 g/km
Engine capacity 1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Curb weight 1,682 - 1,948 kg
Trunk capacity 705 - 885 L
Width 1,853 - 1,866 mm
Brand VW
Payload 497 - 573 kg

details

VW Tayron as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly see which one matches your priorities.

The VW Tayron combines a roomy, practical interior with a composed, comfortable ride that suits both daily commuting and longer journeys. With a restrained, modern design and a focus on straightforward tech and safety, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want Volkswagen refinement without unnecessary flash.

Quick data check: VW Tayron

visibly cheaper
only slightly lighter
substantially more power
significantly more efficient
clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
considerably more trunk space

Compare directly with VW Tayron

from £34,200

Ford Kuga

Price 34,200 - 46,300 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 243 HP
Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Electric Range 68 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.3 - 9.9 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model Kuga
Modell Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga 2.5 FHEV, Kuga 2.5 PHEV, Kuga Active X 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga Active X 2.5 FHEV, Kuga Active X 2.5 PHEV
CO2 Efficiency Class E, D, B
Trim Level Titanium, ST-Line, ST-Line X, Sound Edition, Titanium CVT, Titanium Allrad CVT, ST-Line CVT, ST-Line Allrad CVT, ST-Line X CVT, ST-Line X Allrad CVT, Sound Edition CVT, Sound Edition Allrad CVT, Titanium Automatik, ST-Line Automatik, ST-Line X Automatik, Sound Edition Automatik, CVT, Allrad CVT, Automatik
Power kW 111 - 178 kW
co2 55 - 154 g/km
Engine capacity 1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Curb weight 1,526 - 1,859 kg
Width 1,882 mm
Brand Ford
Payload 541 - 550 kg
Variant Active

details

Ford Kuga as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a slightly sharper driving feel.

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

Quick data check: Ford Kuga

moderately cheaper
considerably more power
considerably more efficient
considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
marginally lighter

Compare directly with Ford Kuga

from £29,100

Skoda Karoq

Price 29,100 - 41,700 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 190 HP
Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7 - 11.2 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model Karoq
Modell Karoq 1.0 TSI, Karoq 1.5 TSI, Karoq 2.0 TDI, Karoq 2.0 TSI
CO2 Efficiency Class D, E, F
Trim Level Selection, Selection DSG, Sportline, Sportline DSG, Sportline 4x4 DSG, Selection 4x4 DSG, Balance, Balance DSG, Balance 4x4 DSG
Power kW 85 - 140 kW
co2 128 - 173 g/km
Engine capacity 999 - 1,984 cm3
Curb weight 1,380 - 1,655 kg
Trunk capacity 521 L
Width 1,841 mm
Brand Skoda
Payload 456 - 549 kg

details

Skoda Karoq as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium feel; pick the Karoq if practicality, lower running costs and smarter packaging win your heart.

Skoda Karoq is a smartly packaged compact SUV that balances practical family-friendly space with composed handling, making daily drives feel easy and assured. Its straightforward design, roomy cabin with clever storage solutions, and sensible equipment make it a strong choice for buyers seeking value and versatility without fuss.

Quick data check: Skoda Karoq

only slightly cheaper
markedly more power
significantly more efficient
considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
slightly lighter
somewhat more trunk space

Compare directly with Skoda Karoq

from £23,900

Ford Puma

Price 23,900 - 36,300 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 125 - 168 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range 404 - 417 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.8 s
Model Year 2,025 - 2,026
Torque 170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3
Model Puma
Modell Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid, Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST, Puma Gen-E
CO2 Efficiency Class D, A
Trim Level Titanium, Titanium PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line, ST-Line PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line X, ST-Line X PowerShift Automatik, PowerShift Automatik, BlueCruise Edition PowerShift Automatik, Premium, BlueCruise Edition
Power kW 92 - 124 kW
co2 0 - 135 g/km
Engine capacity 999 cm3
Curb weight 1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity 456 - 523 L
Width 1,805 mm
Brand Ford
Payload 367 - 469 kg
Variant ST, Gen-E

details

Ford Puma as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

In the compact SUV segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-5 offer distinct experiences for drivers. The Ford Puma, known for its agile handling and sporty design, appeals to those craving a dynamic driving experience in urban environments. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its luxurious interior and exceptional comfort, making it a favorite for families who prioritize long-distance comfort and everyday usability.

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

Quick data check: Ford Puma

noticeably cheaper
a bit more power
markedly more efficient
substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
visibly lighter
moderately more trunk space

Compare directly with Ford Puma

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mazda CX-5 head-to-head against similar models.

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.