Mazda CX-5 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-5, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mazda CX-5

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-5 and are good next research steps.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details

Mazda CX-60 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while the CX-60 targets those who want extra refinement, performance and advanced tech.

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-60

  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
Compare directly with Mazda CX-60
from £29,100
Karoq

Skoda Karoq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
details

Skoda Karoq as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium feel; pick the Karoq if practicality, lower running costs and smarter packaging win your heart.

Skoda Karoq is a smartly packaged compact SUV that balances practical family-friendly space with composed handling, making daily drives feel easy and assured. Its straightforward design, roomy cabin with clever storage solutions, and sensible equipment make it a strong choice for buyers seeking value and versatility without fuss.

Quick data check: Skoda Karoq

  • only slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
Compare directly with Skoda Karoq
from £42,800
CX-6e

Mazda CX-6e

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 468 - 484 km
details

Mazda CX-6e as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on the driveway.

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-6e

  • considerably more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
Compare directly with Mazda CX-6e
from £34,200
X-Trail

Nissan X-Trail

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 213 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
details

Nissan X-Trail as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the X-Trail excels in spaciousness and versatility, making it an ideal choice for families and outdoor enthusiasts alike.

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

Quick data check: Nissan X-Trail

  • clearly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
Compare directly with Nissan X-Trail
from £41,900
XC40

Volvo XC40

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.5 L/100km
details

Volvo XC40 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes safety, clever interior packaging and a modern, minimalist design—so your choice depends on whether you value driver enjoyment or city-friendly versatility and tech-forward safety.

The Volvo XC40 blends Scandinavian design with practical versatility, offering a compact luxury crossover that feels composed and easy to live with. It’s refined and focused on safety with a high-quality interior, making it a smart choice for daily city driving and weekend escapes.

Quick data check: Volvo XC40

  • visibly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
Compare directly with Volvo XC40
from £35,100
ZR-V

Honda ZR-V

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 5.8 L/100km
details

Honda ZR-V as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-5

Choosing between the Honda ZR-V and the Mazda CX-5 comes down to whether you prioritize roomy practicality and efficiency or sharper driving dynamics and a more premium cabin. The ZR-V leans toward user-friendly space, good fuel economy and value, while the CX-5 delivers engaging handling, stronger engine choices and a more refined interior.

The Honda ZR-V blends smart practicality with sharper styling than you might expect, giving buyers a calm, competent companion for daily life. Inside it's comfortable and cleverly laid out, easy to live with and never trying too hard to be exciting.

Quick data check: Honda ZR-V

  • noticeably more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
Compare directly with Honda ZR-V

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mazda CX-5 head-to-head against similar models.

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.