Mercedes GLC alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mercedes GLC, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

The Mercedes GLC blends plush cabin comfort and composed road manners into an SUV that feels more grown-up than it looks. It won’t shout for attention, but will quietly please buyers who want refinement, usable space and a touch of luxury without the drama.

Mercedes GLC

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mercedes GLC and are good next research steps.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 620 - 810 km
details

Quick data check: Volvo EX60

  • barely cheaper
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
  • barely more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Volvo XC60 as a suitable alternative to Mercedes GLC

When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, the Volvo XC60 impresses with its emphasis on safety features and Scandinavian design, appealing to buyers looking for both security and aesthetics in their driving experience.

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

Compare directly with Volvo XC60

Quick data check: Volvo XC60

  • markedly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
  • only slightly cheaper
  • barely lighter
from £35,100
RAV4

Toyota RAV4

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 218 - 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 75 km
details

Toyota RAV4 as a suitable alternative to Mercedes GLC

In a head-to-head comparison between the Mercedes GLC and the Toyota RAV4, the luxurious GLC excels in offering a refined driving experience and premium interior materials that define its upscale appeal. Meanwhile, the RAV4 impresses with its practicality, reliability, and advanced safety features, making it a strong contender in the compact SUV segment. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles will depend on a buyer's priorities—luxury and performance versus value and versatility.

The Toyota RAV4 is a pragmatic, family-friendly SUV that pairs impressively low running costs in hybrid form with a relaxed, motorway-friendly ride and a generous rear seat and boot that make everyday life easy. Its cabin leans toward practicality rather than polish—expect plenty of hard plastics and a tidy infotainment system that’s quick to respond but buries some climate functions in a touchscreen and can nag with drive‑recorder popups, so buyers wanting a premium feel or sporty dynamics should look elsewhere.

Compare directly with Toyota RAV4

Quick data check: Toyota RAV4

  • clearly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
from £62,000
Range Rover Velar

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 404 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 10 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 58 km
details

Land Rover Range Rover Velar as a suitable alternative to Mercedes GLC

When comparing the Mercedes GLC to the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, both vehicles offer a luxurious SUV experience, but cater to slightly different preferences. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its refined interior and cutting-edge technology, appealing to those who value comfort and connectivity. On the other hand, the Range Rover Velar impresses with its robust off-road capabilities and striking design, making it the choice for adventurers seeking style and capability in one sophisticated package.

The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.

Compare directly with Land Rover Range Rover Velar

Quick data check: Land Rover Range Rover Velar

  • markedly cheaper
  • considerably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
from £50,500
E Class

Mercedes E Class

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 186 - 585 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 101 - 116 km
details

Mercedes E Class as a suitable alternative to Mercedes GLC

In the world of luxury vehicles, the Mercedes GLC and the Mercedes E-Klasse both offer a blend of elegance and performance, yet cater to different driving experiences. The GLC, a compact luxury SUV, delivers versatility and a commanding road presence with its higher stance, making it ideal for those seeking a balance between urban agility and weekend adventures. Conversely, the E-Klasse sedan exudes sophistication and refinement, offering a plush ride with its advanced technology and spacious interiors, appealing to those who prioritize an executive feel and superior comfort on longer journeys.

The Mercedes E‑Class is the executive saloon that balances calm refinement with a hint of sporting intent, wrapping luxury in tasteful understatement. It pampers occupants with a composed ride and intuitive tech while quietly reminding you that it’s still very much a Mercedes — authoritative, polished, and unwilling to shout for attention.

Compare directly with Mercedes E Class

Quick data check: Mercedes E Class

  • marginally cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
  • barely more efficient
  • barely lighter
from £51,100
G9

XPeng G9

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 351 - 575 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 502 - 585 km
details

Quick data check: XPeng G9

  • only slightly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • barely more trunk space

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mercedes GLC head-to-head against similar models.

Mercedes GLC
Volvo EX60
VS
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
Mercedes GLC
Toyota RAV4
VS
Mercedes GLC
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
VS
Mercedes GLC
Mercedes E Class
VS
Mercedes GLC
XPeng G9
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.