Mitsubishi Outlander alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mitsubishi Outlander, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mitsubishi Outlander and are good next research steps.

from £38,600

MG MGS9

Price 38,600 - 41,800 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 299 HP
Consumption L/100km 2.4 L/100km
Electric Range 100 km
Seats 7
Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.6 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 390 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model MGS9
Modell MGS9 1.5T GDI PHEV
CO2 Efficiency Class B
Trim Level Comfort Automatik, Premium Automatik
Power kW 220 kW
co2 54 g/km
Engine capacity 1,496 cm3
Curb weight 2,160 kg
Trunk capacity 332 L
Width 1,967 mm
Brand MG
Payload 557 kg
Variant PHEV

details

Quick data check: MG MGS9

marginally more power
noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
barely lighter
noticeably more trunk space
a bit cheaper
very slightly more efficient
slightly more electric range

Compare directly with MG MGS9

from £37,900

Skoda Kodiaq

Price 37,900 - 50,600 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 265 HP
Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Electric Range 119 - 122 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.3 - 9.7 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,025
Torque 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Kodiaq
Modell Kodiaq 2.0 TSI, Kodiaq RS, Kodiaq 1.5 TSI mHEV, Kodiaq 2.0 TDI, Kodiaq 1.5 TSI iV PHEV
CO2 Efficiency Class F, G, E, B
Trim Level Selection 4x4 DSG, Sportline 4x4 DSG, 4x4 DSG, Selection DSG, Sportline DSG
Power kW 110 - 195 kW
co2 35 - 186 g/km
Engine capacity 1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Curb weight 1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity 745 - 910 L
Width 1,864 mm
Brand Skoda
Payload 460 - 563 kg
Variant RS

details

Skoda Kodiaq as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi Outlander

The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can choose the one that best fits your driving needs and ownership priorities.

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

Quick data check: Skoda Kodiaq

slightly more power
a bit cheaper
clearly more efficient
markedly more electric range
noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
noticeably lighter
significantly more trunk space

Compare directly with Skoda Kodiaq

from £34,200

Ford Kuga

Price 34,200 - 46,300 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 243 HP
Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Electric Range 68 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.3 - 9.9 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model Kuga
Modell Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga 2.5 FHEV, Kuga 2.5 PHEV, Kuga Active X 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga Active X 2.5 FHEV, Kuga Active X 2.5 PHEV
CO2 Efficiency Class E, D, B
Trim Level Titanium, ST-Line, ST-Line X, Sound Edition, Titanium CVT, Titanium Allrad CVT, ST-Line CVT, ST-Line Allrad CVT, ST-Line X CVT, ST-Line X Allrad CVT, Sound Edition CVT, Sound Edition Allrad CVT, Titanium Automatik, ST-Line Automatik, ST-Line X Automatik, Sound Edition Automatik, CVT, Allrad CVT, Automatik
Power kW 111 - 178 kW
co2 55 - 154 g/km
Engine capacity 1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Curb weight 1,526 - 1,859 kg
Width 1,882 mm
Brand Ford
Payload 541 - 550 kg
Variant Active

details

Ford Kuga as a suitable alternative to Mitsubishi Outlander

The Ford Kuga and Mitsubishi Outlander both bring strong attributes to the compact SUV market, yet cater to slightly different audiences. The Kuga is praised for its sporty handling and modern, tech-rich interior, making it an appealing option for urban drivers who appreciate a sleek design. On the other hand, the Outlander shines with its spacious cabin and superior off-road capabilities, ideal for families or adventure seekers needing more versatility and room for passengers and cargo.

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

Quick data check: Ford Kuga

clearly more power
marginally more efficient
somewhat more electric range
visibly cheaper
barely quicker 0–100 km/h
clearly lighter

Compare directly with Ford Kuga

from £41,100

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Price 41,100 - 48,200 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 218 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range 615 - 627 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.9 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 300 Nm
Model Eclipse Cross
Modell Eclipse Cross EV
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Diamant Plus, Diamant Top, Diamant Top Luxury Paket
Power kW 160 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 1,922 - 1,950 kg
Trunk capacity 545 L
Width 1,908 mm
Brand Mitsubishi
Payload 385 - 413 kg

details

Quick data check: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

visibly more power
very slightly cheaper
significantly more electric range
a bit lighter
marginally more trunk space

Compare directly with Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

from £34,300

BYD Seal U

Price 34,300 - 39,800 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 218 - 324 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 12.1 - 20.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range 70 - 500 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.9 - 9.6 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,026
Torque 300 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Seal U
Modell Seal U, Seal U DM-i
CO2 Efficiency Class A, B
Trim Level Comfort, Design, Boost, Design AWD
Power kW 160 - 238 kW
co2 0 - 71 g/km
Engine capacity 1,497 - 1,498 cm3
Curb weight 1,940 - 2,147 kg
Trunk capacity 425 - 552 L
Width 1,890 mm
Brand BYD
Payload 410 kg
Variant DM-i

details

Quick data check: BYD Seal U

markedly cheaper
only slightly more power
considerably more electric range
markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
slightly lighter
only slightly more trunk space

Compare directly with BYD Seal U

from £58,300

Volvo XC60

Price 58,300 - 71,400 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 335 - 406 HP
Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
Electric Range 79 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.9 - 5.7 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 589 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model XC60
Modell XC60 T6, XC60 T8
CO2 Efficiency Class B
Trim Level Essential AWD Geartronic, Core AWD Geartronic, Plus Black Edition AWD Geartronic, Plus Dark AWD Geartronic, Plus Bright AWD Geartronic, Ultra Black Edition AWD Geartronic, Ultra Dark AWD Geartronic, Ultra Bright AWD Geartronic
Power kW 247 - 299 kW
co2 59 g/km
Engine capacity 1,969 cm3
Curb weight 2,150 kg
Width 1,902 mm
Brand Volvo
Payload 510 kg

details

Quick data check: Volvo XC60

markedly cheaper
very slightly more electric range
noticeably more power
substantially more efficient
considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
marginally lighter

Compare directly with Volvo XC60

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mitsubishi Outlander head-to-head against similar models.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.