@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Aixam Minauto vs Mazda CX-80 – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Aixam Minauto meets Mazda CX-80.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Aixam Minauto has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 8900 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 39309 £.

As for range, the Aixam Minauto performs a bit better – achieving up to 75 km, about 14 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a convincingly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 8 HP. That’s roughly 319 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs significantly better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Aixam Minauto tops out at 45 km/h. The difference is around 174 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls convincingly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 40 Nm. That’s about 510 Nm difference.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers convincingly more seating capacity – 7 vs 2.

In curb weight, Aixam Minauto is clearly lighter – 425 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 1706 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-80 offers convincingly more room – 258 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 258 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs clearly better – up to 1971 L, which is about 1271 L more than the Aixam Minauto.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 convincingly takes the win – 650 kg compared to 250 kg. That’s a difference of about 400 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be edges ahead and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,200
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km
details

Aixam Minauto

The Aixam Minauto is a distinctive vehicle that combines style and practicality, making it an appealing choice for urban driving. Its compact design allows for easy navigation through crowded city streets, while the comfortable interior ensures a pleasant ride. With a focus on efficiency and accessibility, the Minauto stands out as a solution for those seeking a unique alternative to conventional cars.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Aixam Minauto
Mazda CX-80
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
8900 - 10800 £
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
75 km
Electric Range
61 km
Battery Capacity
5.50 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
16 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
7
Doors
3
Doors
5
Curb weight
425 kg
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity
0 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
2759 mm
Length
4995 mm
Width
1500 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
-
Height
1714 mm
Max trunk capacity
700 L
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Payload
250 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
8 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
45 km/h
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Torque
21 - 40 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
2
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
6 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
479 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2023 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Aixam
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct approaches to luxury and practicality. The CX-80 impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touareg
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg, the Mazda shines with its sleek design and fuel-efficient performance that appeals to drivers seeking both aesthetics and economy. Conversely, the Touareg stands out by offering a luxurious interior and robust powertrain options that cater …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW X5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the realm of luxury SUVs, the BMW X5 offers a blend of performance and opulence with its powerful engine options, refined interior, and cutting-edge technology. On the other hand, the new Mazda CX-80 presents a compelling alternative, delivering a spacious yet elegant cabin and Mazda's signature …
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Grand Cherokee
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Jeep Grand Cherokee or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus RX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and Toyota RAV4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the Aixam Minauto?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.