In the competitive world of SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-80 have carved their niches, offering distinct flavours of style, performance, and innovation. As we delve into the technical aspects and innovations of these two popular models, potential buyers can gain insights into which vehicle might better suit their needs.
When it comes to performance, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its robust engine options. The model comes with a choice between a plug-in hybrid and a diesel MHEV, providing power outputs of 327 HP and 254 HP, respectively. These are complemented by torque figures of 500 Nm and 550 Nm, ensuring that the CX-80 doesn't just look powerful but also feels it on the road.
In contrast, the Honda CR-V offers a more modest power output with a maximum of 184 HP from its full hybrid and plug-in hybrid engines. Torque-like figures, at 335 Nm, are respectable, promoting smooth and reliable performance suitable for everyday driving. The CR-V falls slightly behind in acceleration, with times ranging from 9 to 9.5 seconds to reach 100km/h, whereas the CX-80 can accomplish this in as little as 6.8 seconds.
Efficiency is where the CR-V shines. With consumption figures as low as 0.8 L/100km in its hybrid variations, it appeals to those concerned with eco-friendliness and operating costs. The electric range of 79 km for the CR-V's hybrid version is competitive, offering ample range for city commuting without engaging the gasoline engine.
The CX-80, while packing more power, also boasts an efficient plug-in hybrid with a consumption of 1.6 L/100km, along with a decent electric range of 60 km. Although slightly less efficient than the CR-V, this still presents a viable option for eco-aware consumers.
The Mazda CX-80 stretches to 4995 mm in length and offers seating for seven, making it the go-to choice for larger families and those who frequently travel with more passengers. The increased dimensions, however, result in a smaller trunk capacity at 258 liters compared to the CR-V's maximum of 617 liters, which may be a consideration for those prioritizing cargo space.
The Honda CR-V, slightly shorter at 4706 mm, seats five passengers and focuses on maximizing space efficiency. Its generous trunk capacity and compact dimensions provide a balance of practicality and comfort, while its sleek design makes it easy to maneuver and park.
Both vehicles are equipped with the latest technological features, from advanced safety systems to infotainment enhancements. The CR-V incorporates Honda’s acclaimed safety suite, ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.
The CX-80 matches this with Mazda's suite of cutting-edge safety and driver assistance technologies, along with a premium interior that reflects Mazda's focus on luxury-like refinement.
Choosing between the Honda CR-V and the Mazda CX-80 ultimately depends on individual priorities. The CR-V offers a superb balance of efficiency, practicality, and everyday reliability, perfect for those focused on economy and cargo space. Meanwhile, the CX-80 delivers vigorous performance and additional seating, ideal for those who prioritize power and capacity.
Both models represent impressive feats of engineering in the SUV category, each catering to distinct preferences and lifestyles in the automotive market.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Honda CR-V has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42800 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 5443 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda CR-V manages with 0.90 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 1.60 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Honda CR-V performs noticeable better – achieving up to 79 km, about 18 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a decisively edge – offering 327 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 143 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs a bit better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Honda CR-V tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls evident stronger with 550 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 215 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Honda CR-V is slightly lighter – 1821 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 310 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Honda CR-V offers clearly more room – 617 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 359 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs slightly better – up to 1971 L, which is about 261 L more than the Honda CR-V.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 evident takes the win – 650 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.
Overall, the Mazda CX-80 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.
details
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42800 - 52100 £
|
Price
48200 - 60200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 6.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
79 km
|
Electric Range
61 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
19 - 152 g/km
|
co2
35 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 - 57 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1821 - 1988 kg
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
4706 mm
|
Length
4995 mm
|
|
Width
1866 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1684 mm
|
Height
1714 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1634 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
|
|
Payload
439 - 475 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
187 - 195 km/h
|
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
335 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The Honda CR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España