Compare performance (280 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (26,100 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Skoda Elroq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Alfa Romeo Junior is substantially cheaper – starting at 26,100 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,768 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Alfa Romeo Junior is very slightly more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 15.2 kWh/100km for the Skoda Elroq. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 573 km, about 163 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Alfa Romeo Junior takes 5.9 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior is slightly faster – reaching 206 km/h, while the Skoda Elroq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 334 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is significantly lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 2,133 kg. The difference is around 753 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers moderately more boot space – 470 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Elroq offers slightly more capacity – up to 1,580 L, about 300 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries moderately more – 525 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.
The Skoda Elroq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
detailsThe Skoda Elroq is a sensible, comfort‑focused compact electric SUV that puts a premium on a roomy rear seat, quiet long‑distance manners and straightforward, low‑distraction controls — perfect for families and commuters who value everyday usability. Its practical Simply‑Clever touches and strong value make it a convincing all‑rounder, though those chasing class‑leading fast charging or the most flexible boot space might look elsewhere.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,100 - 41,600 £
|
Price
37,900 - 45,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
529 - 573 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,689 kg
|
Curb weight
2,133 - 2,265 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
4,173 mm
|
Length
4,488 mm
|
|
Width
1,781 mm
|
Width
1,884 mm
|
|
Height
1,505 - 1,538 mm
|
Height
1,625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,205 - 1,280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,580 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
467 - 525 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Skoda
|