Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Skoda Elroq – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alfa Romeo Junior or Skoda Elroq fits your lifestyle better.
Junior
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alfa Romeo Junior has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26100 £, while the Skoda Elroq costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 2957 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alfa Romeo Junior: with 15.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Skoda Elroq with 15.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.10 kWh.
As for range, the Skoda Elroq performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 573 km, about 163 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
Elroq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq has a somewhat edge – offering 340 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Alfa Romeo Junior takes 5.90 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs slightly better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Skoda Elroq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Elroq pulls significantly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 334 Nm difference.
Junior
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is significantly lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1953 kg. The difference is around 573 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers a bit more room – 470 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Elroq performs slightly better – up to 1580 L, which is about 300 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Elroq clearly perceptible takes the win – 531 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 111 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Elroq shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £29,100
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
Alfa Romeo Junior
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
details
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Skoda Elroq
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Alfa Romeo Junior
Skoda Elroq
|
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26100 - 41600 £
|
Price
29100 - 45500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
377 - 573 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
1953 - 2268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4488 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1884 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1608 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1580 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
470 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the Alfa Romeo Junior?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.