Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (280 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (26100 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Volvo XC40?
Junior
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alfa Romeo Junior has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26100 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10662 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Alfa Romeo Junior manages with 4.80 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.
XC40
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior has a distinct edge – offering 280 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 83 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs a bit better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Junior pulls somewhat stronger with 345 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Junior
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is noticeable lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 308 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers barely noticeable more room – 452 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 37 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs minimal better – up to 1328 L, which is about 48 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 clearly perceptible takes the win – 532 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Alfa Romeo Junior is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Volvo XC40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £26,100
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alfa Romeo Junior
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
details
Volvo XC40
5 (4 Reviews)
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
Alfa Romeo Junior
Volvo XC40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26100 - 41600 £
|
Price
36800 - 47200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
1688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1863 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1652 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drive types are available for the Alfa Romeo Junior?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.