VS

Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Ford Kuga comparison

Compare performance (268 HP vs 243 HP), boot space and price (35,500 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Tonale or Ford Kuga?

Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Ford Kuga: Key differences

Alfa Romeo Tonale

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
details

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Tonale

Alfa Romeo Tonale vs. Ford Kuga: A Clash of Innovative SUVs

As the demand for SUVs continues to rise, two models have emerged as fascinating contenders in the ever-evolving landscape of hybrid automotive technology: the Alfa Romeo Tonale and the Ford Kuga. Both vehicles promise a blend of style, innovation, and performance. Let's delve into the technical details and key features that make each a prominent choice in the hybrid SUV market.

Kuga

Design and Dimensions

The Alfa Romeo Tonale is crafted with the hallmark Italian flair, offering an exterior length of 4528 mm, width of 1835 mm, and a height of 1614 mm. It carries its distinctive aesthetic appeal with sleek lines that exude sophistication. On the other hand, the Ford Kuga is slightly larger, measuring between 4604 mm to 4645 mm in length, 1882 mm in width, and 1673 mm to 1681 mm in height. Its bolder and more muscular stance caters to those who appreciate a more robust appearance.

Tonale

Engine Options and Performance

Under the hood, the Alfa Romeo Tonale presents versatile engine choices with plug-in hybrid, petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV), and diesel options. The Tonale can deliver an impressive 280 HP with its all-wheel-drive plug-in hybrid version, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 6.2 seconds. The better CO2 efficiency class ranges from B to E, indicating a commitment to reducing emissions.

Conversely, the Ford Kuga offers petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid engines. With power outputs peaking at 243 HP for the plug-in hybrid variant, it achieves a swift 0-100 km/h in 7.3 seconds. The Kuga boasts a marginally superior electric range of 69 km, compared to the Tonale's 63 km, emphasizing its efficiency credentials with a notable CO2 output as low as 20 g/km.

Kuga

Transmission and Drive

The transmission game is well-played by both contenders. The Tonale comes exclusively with automatic transmission, including options for an automatic gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic system, facilitating a smooth driving experience. It offers both all-wheel and front-wheel drive options.

The Ford Kuga, meanwhile, provides more flexibility with both manual and automatic options, alongside the innovative CVT for a continuous and efficient ride. It also offers front-wheel and all-wheel drive, catering to varied driving preferences.

Tonale

Interior, Comfort, and Utility

Inside, both SUVs are spacious with seating for up to five passengers. The Tonale tends to favor luxury, considering its notable Italian lineage, while also offering a trunk capacity between 385 to 500 liters, making it practical for family outings or long trips.

The Ford Kuga, with its higher trunk capacity of 412 liters, leans towards comfort and utility, making use of every inch of its interior space. Both models prioritize passenger comfort and are well-equipped with the latest in entertainment and navigation systems, ensuring a gratifying travel experience.

Kuga

Fuel Efficiency and Eco-Friendliness

Fuel consumption is a highlight in both models, with the Tonale recording a frugal consumption rate starting at just 1.3 L/100km for its plug-in hybrid variant. The Ford Kuga is competitive with its plug-in hybrid managing an outstanding 0.9 L/100km, positioning itself as an ideal choice for eco-conscious drivers.

Tonale

Conclusion: Choosing Your Hybrid Champion

The Alfa Romeo Tonale and the Ford Kuga both embody the progress of hybrid technology in SUVs. The Tonale appeals to those who value luxurious design and powerful performance, while the Kuga stands proud for its efficiency and practicality.

Ultimately, the choice between them will boil down to personal preferences: do you lean towards the elegance and legacy of Italian manufacturing, or does the robust and environmentally friendly American SUV meet your needs better? Whichever you choose, rest assured that both vehicles represent the cutting edge of today's hybrid SUV offerings.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tonale

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Kuga is only slightly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Tonale costs 35,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,243 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Tonale with 3.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Kuga offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 68 km, about 6 km more than the Alfa Romeo Tonale.

Kuga

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Tonale offers barely more power – delivering 268 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Alfa Romeo Tonale takes 10.9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alfa Romeo Tonale delivers markedly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Tonale

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is only slightly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,600 kg. The difference is around 74 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries only slightly more – 550 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 68 km
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Ford Kuga

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Alfa Romeo Tonale

The Alfa Romeo Tonale embodies the brand's timeless elegance and sporty DNA, captivating drivers with its bold design and dynamic presence on the road. Inside, the Tonale impresses with a perfect blend of luxury and cutting-edge technology, offering a sophisticated driving experience that remains true to the Alfa Romeo spirit. With its agile performance and distinctive character, the Tonale stands out in the competitive SUV market, appealing to those who seek both style and substance.

details

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
Alfa Romeo Tonale
Ford Kuga

Costs and Consumption

Price
35,500 - 53,200 £
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
62 km
Electric Range
68 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
77 - 138 g/km
co2
55 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,600 - 1,910 kg
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Trunk capacity
385 - 500 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,835 mm
Width
1,882 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 - 535 kg
Payload
541 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 268 HP
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 Nm
Torque
240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
96 - 197 kW
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.